Aren't you entitled to defend yourself?So the guards can prosecute someone and they have no possibility of a defence?
Yeah, I can't see that being abused at all at all...
Aren't you entitled to defend yourself?So the guards can prosecute someone and they have no possibility of a defence?
Yeah, I can't see that being abused at all at all...
You are, but most people would not have the ability to do so.Aren't you entitled to defend yourself?
More of a headlessIve a more head on approach to FLA
If found guilty on more than 3 occasions of any criminal activity
No further FLA whatsoever
I was thinking more of FIS.Like free legal aid?
I'm afraid people with multiple convictions are treating the FLA like FIS. It maddens me that they can come back to the well so many times without any threat of it costing them a cent. It should be withdrawn if being abused.I was thinking more of FIS.
The purpose of FLA is to ensure that everyone (who is at risk of a jail sentence at any rate) is able to access a fair defence.I'm afraid people with multiple convictions are treating the FLA like FIS. It maddens me that they can come back to the well so many times without any threat of it costing them a cent. It should be withdrawn if being abused.
If you refuse someone the ability to put up a defence then they can't have the presumption of innocence.Isn't everyone granted and entitled to the presumption of innocence?
Regarding the not being caught bit, surely anyone with 100 or 200 convictions must realise that they're not very good at what they're up to. Also why should the poor fuckers that get up every day at 06:30 pay for a shower of c***s ( and I'm referring to the people mentioned above)on the dole (with zero intention of ever coming off it), thieving, assaulting, bleeding the FLA dry,and basically making life miserable for the 99% who just want to have a life?
Ol FlaThe word fla caught my eye.