last year sf supporters praised michael D for not going to the centenary event,
Last night sf supporters praised conor murphy for going to a jubilee celebration event in armagh,
Orange Order are not expelling anyone involved in the video
Quell shock and surprise
One shower up there are as bad as the other.
The lad that posted it would be better off moving to Andersonstown in Belfast. He'd have more of a chance there.
Again with the apology "it was not meant to be seen" ,same as the Dundonald hall apology, "was not meant to be broadcast". How thick are these cunts or is it that, that's the best they can do. The "seeing" and "broadcasting" are bad but it's what you said/sang that disgusting, to few or many it's the words/sentiment you used that are the problem.
I presume preacher is like pastor, anyone can take on the title off their own back.
But when somebody spends their life refusing to recognise a monarchy as a republican but then goes to an event celebratingPicture the scene, you've a neighbour with whom you are in dispute over a boundary wall. Generally the neighbour is decent puts a bit of work your way and you're never stuck for a cup of sugar or the like, and ye've generally had similar interests and joined the same resident's association and in the whole get on about most things and your kids and their kids generally play together. But ye just don't see eye to eye on where the property boundary exists. You recieve an invite to a BBQ from them where the entire BBQ setup is on the disputed piece of land and it's a celebration to mark the acquisition of the land. Would you go?
Subsequently, there's a big party on the estate becuase the granny of the house next door who recently came to one of your family funerals and had spoken very well about the deceased and had said that the whole land-dispute could and should be resolved to everybody's satisfaction, is celebrating her longevity. Would you accept the invite to that party even though you'd not attended the BBQ?
You ask your solicitor to deal with the Land Registry and establish the legal boundary all in agreement with your neighbour and then you move the fock on.Picture the scene, you've a neighbour with whom you are in dispute over a boundary wall. Generally the neighbour is decent puts a bit of work your way and you're never stuck for a cup of sugar or the like, and ye've generally had similar interests and joined the same resident's association and in the whole get on about most things and your kids and their kids generally play together. But ye just don't see eye to eye on where the property boundary exists. You recieve an invite to a BBQ from them where the entire BBQ setup is on the disputed piece of land and it's a celebration to mark the acquisition of the land. Would you go?
Subsequently, there's a big party on the estate becuase the granny of the house next door who recently came to one of your family funerals and had spoken very well about the deceased and had said that the whole land-dispute could and should be resolved to everybody's satisfaction, is celebrating her longevity. Would you accept the invite to that party even though you'd not attended the BBQ?
And supporting the organisation that murdered a member of her family.But when somebody spends their life refusing to recognise a monarchy as a republican but then goes to an event celebrating
a monarchy?
There's an obvious distinction here.But when somebody spends their life refusing to recognise a monarchy as a republican but then goes to an event celebrating
a monarchy?