Yeah, it is interesting (and I know what you mean about that word!)
I thought that the documentary itself kinds blurred lines between stuff that was creepy and gross but perfectly legal, and stuff that (if true) is criminal behaviour. I'm not mad about that as an approach tbh.
Like in the Belfast rape cases, those guys behaved very badly, but not illegally. But it ended up with this sense that they should be convicted for the whatsapp messages they sent etc, when that stuff isn't criminal.
There is no doubt that Brand is a letch, he gleefully admits that himself. But that doesn't automatically mean he is a rapist.
I was struck watching the doc though at how much the line has moved since the early 2000s in terms of what is acceptable. Nowdays, he would be cancelled for the contents of the the Jimmy Saville interview alone!