You sure about that?
The reason I ask is it's been related previously that strips of land from farms would have been sold originally to the railroad and said strips of land then were owned by the railway company. BUT many years subsequently, after the railways were no longer being run, in many cases farmers took adverse possession of the land. The railway companies didn't care much about strips of land that were of no use once the railways stopped running there, and didn't kick up about people using land which belonged to the railway, and after I think it's 12 years unbroken possession the farmers in question had "squatters rights" and would need to be compensated to relinquish said strips of land.