Cyclists

[Crankycorner]

I'd say you've brains to burn ??

When you’ve to resort to picking up on a typo it’s not a great sign ?

 

[timmyjimmy82]

When you’ve to resort to picking up on a typo it’s not a great sign ?

When you have to resort to explaining yourself, it's not a great sign

 

[Crankycorner]

When you have to resort to explaining yourself, it's not a great sign

Yet you’ve felt the need to. Deary me.

 

[Drucker]

Yes, context is everything. Driving 279 km/h is illegal on Irish roads, cycling 40 km/h is not.

Context is indeed everything. Driving at 30km/h is not illegal. However driving at 30 Km/h may be deemed “careless” or even “dangerous” in the context of where it took place in terms of road conditions, presence of pedestrians, etc, in the same way cyclists can be fined for driving without reasonable consideration for other road users.

From the rules of the road:

Gardaí can fine cyclists for the following offences:

• No front or rear light during lighting-up hours
• Riding a bicycle without reasonable consideration

Context, dear boy, is everything.

 

[fed up]

Christ almighty, talk about giving the twat the attention he craves.

 

[timmyjimmy82]

Context is indeed everything. Driving at 30km/h is not illegal. However driving at 30 Km/h may be deemed “careless” or even “dangerous” in the context of where it took place in terms of road conditions, presence of pedestrians, etc, in the same way cyclists can be fined for driving without reasonable consideration for other road users.

From the rules of the road:

Gardaí can fine cyclists for the following offences:

• No front or rear light during lighting-up hours
• Riding a bicycle without reasonable consideration

Well done on posting the obvious ?

 

[Drucker]

Well done on posting the obvious ?

You’re welcome.
We got there in the end.

 

[timmyjimmy82]

You’re welcome.
We got there in the end.

Glad you finally caught up

 

[Drucker]

Christ almighty, talk about giving the twat the attention he craves.

You’re not wrong.
Well I’m sure there’s an echo chamber somewhere looking for him….

 

[SoundMan]

The key words there are 'could'. GDPR is loose in their terms.

Anyway, it doesn't state categorically that one cannot publish videos online of incidents that happen in public, especially when people are not identified.

If one wants to be extra cautious, blurring out their face will make it 100% legit.

Doubtful that blurring out their face will be sufficient if you are still publishing their car registration from which they are easily identified.

See when Google Maps do the street-view and they pixilate peoples' faces - they also blur the license plates.

Of course that wouldn't suit your perma-outraged agenda.