Cyclists

[Blue Jasmin]

And where did you get that he didn't?

See above.

Off you fuck. ?

 

[yellowsliotar]

Oh please ?Change the record Yellow.

Interesting you didn't answer my question. ?

What record and what question?
For your own information I didn’t read beyond your claim of me making a fool of myself.
Why would I

 

[Chara021]

What record and what question?
For your own information I didn’t read beyond your claim of me making a fool of myself.
Why would I

??? And again! You're simply the gift that keeps on giving.

 

[Chara021]

Interview with the father - it seems to be one of the things that he cannot fathom understandably

Ya I agree. Perhaps a written statement of regret should have been forthcoming.

Having said that what is the usual practice between solicitors about issuing apologies?

Secondly the father of the child said this in an interview.
Had Moynihan had the same interview and asked the same question perhaps he would have expressed his regret and apologised.

Personally I never have much solace in apologies. It's easy to utter empty words.
For me acknowledging and truly understanding the wrong somebody did to me is paramount and is far more comforting.

In this case Moynihan pleaded guilty and accepted the consequences without appeal. Indicating he acknowledges the wrong and understands and accepts the consequences.

Perhaps that man will actually apologise now that he knows the father of the child would like one. Who knows? Maybe not. It's all a bit superficial imo. I'm not sure I would be comforted much by some letter of apology tbh. It might do the opposite.

 

[Chara021]

See above.

Off you fuck. ?

Careful now . Yellow might get upset at how you are expressing yourself ?

Although probably not , he would want to keep his sidekick on side like.

 

[yellowsliotar]

??? And again! You're simply the gift that keeps on giving.

If it keeps you happy.

 

[Blue Jasmin]

Careful now . Yellow might get upset at how you are expressing yourself ?

Although probably not , he would want to keep his sidekick on side like.

Off you fuck too.

 

[yellowsliotar]

Careful now . Yellow might get upset at how you are expressing yourself ?

Although probably not , he would want to keep his sidekick on side like.

Why would I be upset, he didn’t express anything in my direction.

How he is my sidekick?
Because he agrees that Moynihan should have got a longer sentence and is fully responsible for the poor child’s death?
That isn’t a sidekick, that is a genuine caring individual

 

[Chara021]

Why would I be upset, he didn’t express anything in my direction.

How he is my sidekick?
Because he agrees that Moynihan should have got a longer sentence and is fully responsible for the poor child’s death?
That isn’t a sidekick, that is a genuine caring individual

But shur aren't you the one wanging on about bad language and insults and people being in tempers. None of which btw hold any shock factor whatsoever. It's the Proc like. ?

He's a little bit like sidekick. It's coming across that way tbf. Hasnt much to say except ' off you fuxk' to people.

Oh and constantly liking your inane posts. Ya sidekick methinks.

 

[knockfiarna]

it doesn't matter where the crossing is. If the green man is flashing it should be safe to cross.

Driver behaviour in general is absolutely deplorable. You see it every day. Fellas who nip into a yellow box and get caught so nip through the green man when the traffic clears because they are more worried about blocking traffic then protecting vulnerable pedestrians.

Fellas parking the car up on footpaths. Again because they have no regard for pedestrian.

Drivers not stopping to let pedestrians pass Zebra crossings, The pedestrian has right of way once they are at edge. Drivers should stop 100% of the time

I could go on and on and on but there is no point because people don't see these things as the antisocial behaviour they are

I agree with you and 100% when the green man flashes it indicates it is safe to cross.
It's like a red light it 100% means you should stop.
One caveat for me is that when dealing with drivers you are always dealing with adults ,either licenced or unlicensed drivers.
With pedestrians it can be any age ,many people when kids get to a certain age of responsibility will allow their kids walk home from school alone or in a group or with a friend.
That's my reason for questioning the placement of crossings . A child will see the green and trust it and this should always be the case but authorities should have cognisanse of potential dangers and if they can help alleviate or lessen potential accidents happening then why not do it.
This also goes for stopping distances at crossings it should be further back from crossings same as parking close to crossings.
As you say ,careless driving ,phone use ,distraction ,lack of road awareness is rife and people need to cop themselves on behind the wheel .