Usually I try to remain balanced and positive after Cork underage matches, but it's difficult not to be frustrated after a match like last night's. I'm not overly bothered about Cork losing underage games but it's beyond annoying that we never seem to learn our lessons at any level. How many years have people been talking about Cork's kickouts as a weakness (it must be 10 years since Alan O'Connor came out of retirement to help us win kick-outs against Kerry)? Has there been a semblance of improvement in them in the last 10 years? What are Rebel óg doing to address this consistent and obvious area of weakness in the most important area of Gaelic football? We have the largest number of GAA clubs in Ireland, so it's either the typical Cork arrogance of refusing to adapt to the modern game or it's incompetence, but either way it's hard to see things turning around quickly here.
Winning your own kick-outs is one thing but even when we did start winning those long kickouts last night in the second half, it wasn't a massive advantage to us because Kerry only ever had to commit 5/6 players into the Cork half and we started going long. At any given point and time on Cork kick-outs, Kerry were as likely to score as we were as there were 6 defenders in both halves, and the kickouts were high lofty kicks into crowded areas. How often do we see any of the progressive counties accepting such low odds on kick-outs? You will almost never see them go for long 50-50 kick-outs when there are just 8 opposition players in their half, let alone a 6-man zonal press like yesterday. When the likes of Dublin and Kerry go for those long kick-outs it's because they've manipulated the number of players in both halves in such a way that winning possession means that there are goal opportunities and losing kick-outs isn't overly detrimental or threatening as they have 10/11 players behind the ball.
Cork's kick-out strategy was an issue but our setup for Kerry's kickouts was arguably even more disappointing. On Kerry's kickouts we again went with the 6-man zonal press for the majority of the game. A strategy that no other top county has been consistently using in the last 5/6 years, mainly because of its obvious limitations. This, combined with man-to-man marking on the 6 Kerry forwards from kick-outs, meant that we neither overly protected our defence nor looked like regaining possession and building momentum. In fact their second goal came straight from a short kick-out after we missed a goal chance of our own. The Kerry keeper hit the free corner-back from the kick-out and after three passes the ball was in the back of the Cork net. Kerry repeatedly brought their half-forward line and one of their corner-forwards into midfield for kick-outs, and left an ocean of space in front of the Kerry full-forward. It looked like a pretty obvious kick-out move that they had been working on in training to target our set in stone kick-out shape. They could easily have scored another 2/3 goals from variations of the same move throughout the match.
It's been said before, but other counties seem to be treating kick-outs like NFL teams treat restarts. They have 4 or 5 different shapes they can use at any given time on both sides of the ball, depending on the opposition's shape, and within those different shapes they have 9 or 10 variations. The goalkeeper is like the quarter-back and is responsible for picking the best option within the shape, but has the leeway to change the shape. Kerry completely changed their shape after Cork went back to man-to-man marking with 5 minutes to go. They had some other variations they used against Clare of hitting the Kerry half-back on a late run and I'd love to see a comparison of how much time the Cork players playing yesterday had spent on kick-outs against the Kerry players, not just at under 20 level, but throughout the underage youth squads.