Wuhan Wheeze

Did you? He specifically mentions negative effecasy, around 4 mins 30 seconds on .
Here's why paying attention and being educated enough to be able to read a graph are so important.

He "mentions" negative efficacy, then shows a series of graphs by age cohort. On ONE graph, ONE cohort only (the oldest) shows a larger percentage of vaccinated people getting Covid than the unvaccinated. He (and you) run with this to say that there is nEgaTiVe eFfICaCy over time for the vaccine as such, when the graph shows that there might be negative efficacy for a single cohort. What he doesn't address (that is, what a real scientist would ask) is 1) is the difference between the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups statically significant for this particular cohort? and 2) why would the graph look like this ONLY for this cohort? Hmmm. Why only for that cohort? Why do you suppose the vaccine would work differently for this one group?

We don't get to see the numbers behind the graph. Since we know that Covid is most virulent with the most elderly (something you talk about) and since the vaccination push has specifically targeted these people the most, maybe the number of unvaccinated elderly is particularly small relative the the vaccinated since more of them have already died of the disease.

Your "scientist" also doesn't address the fact that the virus mutates (quickly) over time and that the vaccine (like ALL vaccines) has to catch up with the mutations.

You need a new tin hat. FAIL.
 
Here's why paying attention and being educated enough to be able to read a graph are so important.

He "mentions" negative efficacy, then shows a series of graphs by age cohort. On ONE graph, ONE cohort only (the oldest) shows a larger percentage of vaccinated people getting Covid than the unvaccinated. He (and you) run with this to say that there is nEgaTiVe eFfICaCy over time for the vaccine as such, when the graph shows that there might be negative efficacy for a single cohort. What he doesn't address (that is, what a real scientist would ask) is 1) is the difference between the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups statically significant for this particular cohort? and 2) why would the graph look like this ONLY for this cohort? Hmmm. Why only for that cohort? Why do you suppose the vaccine would work differently for this one group?

We don't get to see the numbers behind the graph. Since we know that Covid is most virulent with the most elderly (something you talk about) and since the vaccination push has specifically targeted these people the most, maybe the number of unvaccinated elderly is particularly small relative the the vaccinated since more of them have already died of the disease.

Your "scientist" also doesn't address the fact that the virus mutates (quickly) over time and that the vaccine (like ALL vaccines) has to catch up with the mutations.

You need a new tin hat. FAIL.
Don't the cdc want to add the shot to the childood schedule? Thought I heard this and desantis said they can take a hike?
Why would it be added to the child schedule of shots in the US, lunanacy.
 
Don't the cdc want to add the shot to the childood schedule? Thought I heard this and desantis said they can take a hike?
Why would it be added to the child schedule of shots in the US, lunanacy.
Look at you, changing the subject. 😂 😂

Doesn’t matter. You don’t have any idea what you’re talking about.
 
Says the guy who said NOONE said the vaccine had no effect on transmission!!
Look at you, changing the subject. 😂 😂

(No one is two words, in English).

Also, YOU said that lots of people were claiming that the vaccine prevents all transmission. I said that no one is claiming that.

Nice try. Fail.
 
EVENT GUIDE - HIGHLIGHT
The Lee Sessions Trad Trail
Sin É, Coburg St

3rd Jun 2024 @ 6:30 pm
More info..

Sing It Back!

Cantys, Tomorrow @ 9pm

More events ▼
Top