The official Cork court report thread.

Matlock

Full Member
read the case about the baby savaged by the dog in waterford, the dog snapped at the baby when they first got him, yet they still kept the dog!
It seems that the owner of the dog was the husband of the baby's grandmother and though both the mother and grandmother wanted rid of the dog, the owner didn't. I can't imagine how a family could come through that, it's just unimaginable.

As an aside, why is the described as the dog being destroyed in these cases, rather than the dog being put down?
 

TheEarlofPearl

Full Member
It seems that the owner of the dog was the husband of the baby's grandmother and though both the mother and grandmother wanted rid of the dog, the owner didn't. I can't imagine how a family could come through that, it's just unimaginable.

As an aside, why is the described as the dog being destroyed in these cases, rather than the dog being put down?
The control of dogs act 1986 wording
 
It seems that the owner of the dog was the husband of the baby's grandmother and though both the mother and grandmother wanted rid of the dog, the owner didn't. I can't imagine how a family could come through that, it's just unimaginable.

As an aside, why is the described as the dog being destroyed in these cases, rather than the dog being put down?
"The husband of the baby's grandmother."
So the grandfather?
 

EVENT GUIDE - HIGHLIGHT
Coco Comedy Club: Ross Browne and Guests
The Roundy, Castle St.

19th May 2023 @ 8:30 pm
More info..

Two Time Polka

Crane Lane Theatre, Tomorrow @ 11:50pm

View more events ▼
Top