Thanks for the explanation much appreciated.If the post had ended here, we'd have an accord. However you go on to argue as though it never happened.
I'm gonna have to insist you drop the moniker "sensible"... the cap don't fit.
It's clear you don't understand what liquidation is. I can explain it to you but I can't understand it for you.
Liquidation is not Administration. There's a world of difference between the two. There's plenty resources available if you cared to learn the difference. You might even find out your fantasy of liquidation as a means restructuring debt is a criminal offence. "Sensible" my hole.
You wanna talk about Rangers' licence? I'm happy to talk about that too.... we can get to that once you've brushed up on the UK's 2006 Companies Act. Spoiler alert.... what you think happened isn't what happened at all.
I don't know why you feel the need to double down on this. You are just ignorant on this topic. I'm sure there's things you actually know about. This ain't one of em. No harm done.
We can have a difference of opinion on things no bother. What I won't go along with is re-imagining matters of fact.
Now would you care to answer the question posed, if not thats fine.
My question to you is, if you truly believe they are a completely new entity and separate to the Rangers the rest of us view them as, than why when they were in the third division would you have been pattering on about the HUN and some such when they weren't even your rivals, surely only an idiot would have a rivalry with a team they had never played or competed against?

