Empoli v Juventus
Empoli @ 6.9
Both to score @ 2.32
Empoli @ 6.9
Both to score @ 2.32
Not that I'm aware of, but it makes sense, I suppose, with the new season just started.Anyone else being bomb mailed with free bets for American football the last few weeks?
A sport that the betting company's could easily see I have no interest in (I might have a bet on the superbowl some years, and that's by no means certain either)
Responsible gambling my hole.
It makes sense alright, but it makes a mockery of their responsible gambling bollocks.Not that I'm aware of, but it makes sense, I suppose, with the new season just started.
I think all or most sites these days give people control over their own marketing preferences.It makes sense alright, but it makes a mockery of their responsible gambling bollocks.
"here's some free bets/bonuses to bet on a sport we can see doesn't interest you, but make sure to gamble responsibly"
They're trying to rebrand betting as entertainment, a fiver on a first goalscorer, ten each way on a big race etc, then in the same breathe enticing people to bet on things they know nothing about.
Who is more likely to go betting on the American football with those enticements? I'd say addicts would be first in line.
I think you're missing the point.I think all or most sites these days give people control over their own marketing preferences.
You can probably go to site x and opt out of marketing, if you wish.
No, I know what you're saying, but they'll say that giving customers autonomy over what marketing they receive mitigates the safer gambling angle.I think you're missing the point.
Deliberately.
I receive marketing. I'm well able to ignore any marketing I don't want though, such as bets on American football, Cricket whatever and use the stuff I like. I think they're are people who will be harmed by this though, and the bookies probably have the tools to figure out which sports their customers like and market those to them. It's not an anti marketing thing, it's trying to squeeze more and more from punters who MAY be vulnerable while claiming to be watching out for problem gamblers that is my gripeNo, I know what you're saying, but they'll say that giving customers autonomy over what marketing they receive mitigates the safer gambling angle.
I hadn't considered this tbh.It's also likely that the UKGC put an onus on gambling sites to be very careful how they market to UK based customers they deem potential problem gamblers. They can maybe play a bit more fast and loose with Irish customers as they aren't under that jurisdiction. So, it's quite possible that middle of the road punters, such as yourself (I assume!), will be free to be bombarded by marketing if you don't have your opt-in button switched to off.