Sinn Fein are not a Normal Political Party

Correct, I can just picture the SF/iRA scum celebrating and shouting up the Ra and Chucky our la......or whatever the hell it is.

Being in Government here to that scum only means 1 thing and that is they take it as a mandate from the puppets that voted for them that they want a United Ireland.

Everything else is secondary no matter what they bull shit on about.
Can we put you down as undecided?
 
You seem adamant SF wont be in government here, Id say many would not agree, Of course if current government goes full term and makes inroads on housing in particular there is every chance they will carry on, Recent reports of SF meeting major companies could be a sign they will not go after big business if in government despite what they say in opposition,
I don't think they will "go after" big business either. As I said above people see reds under the bed that are not there in SF at all.

However I do not think they will make it into government.

1. Electorally - they are on let's say 37% even. Looking constituency by constituency and the voting histories in each one - even if they got their candidate numbers right - that will net them mid 60's at best - the game is 80 and the seats they are winning are taking from SD's, Labour, PBP who would presumably be their coalition partners to make up the other 15-20, giving them a majority of 1 or 2 which is very unstable.

2. SF, nor any party, does not own unity. Unity is being advanced more through civic movements than it is by SF. In fact I would contend this will be the last election where they can talk BP or unity because by the lifetime of the following Dáil, given the speed at which attitudes are changing after Brexit, protocol etc etc you could see a BP being called almost in spite of them.

3. As with all other parties - in a post BP world - what happens to SF in a polity that now has unionist parties in it where the constitutional question that divided FF and FG for 90 years is now gone. Politics realigns - Ireland has made great strides in liberalising society , what other meaningful "repeals" are left to happen? A left right divide in a country that has massive FDI and heading back to full employment would probably more likely see an amalgam of FF FG UUP Alliance than it would SF, Labour, SDLP etc etc.

So having 37% assuming an increase since last polling will not put them in government in my view.
And I am increasingly of the view as I said in this thread I think - that they want it that way. Other than the heartland policy areas of social welfare, housing, etc - where is the SF policy on moving the economy into the digital transformation - digital manufacturing, AI, cyber, blockchain - cos God knows we have the expertise in it.

Last point I will make - if i was MLMcD and had 35-37% I would be planning my manifesto now as if I was the presumed government after the next election and putting them out there as what people can EXPECT. Right now she is playing the they are all out to get me card which worked fine last time out but I am not sure people will buy it this time out.
 
You seem adamant SF wont be in government here, Id say many would not agree, Of course if current government goes full term and makes inroads on housing in particular there is every chance they will carry on, Recent reports of SF meeting major companies could be a sign they will not go after big business if in government despite what they say in opposition,
Do the numbers Jim, who is going to go into government with them?
 
As procna has pointed out many sf gains will come at the expense of PBP, labour etc, so i will accept it may lessen chances of a coalition
without the big two, I still say there are enough in FF who would be willing to talk to sf,
Yes I agree, if anyone was to go in with them it would be FF.

Then FF would become the mud guard.
 
Reality is if FF/FG had made more of an effort on housing in particular SF would now be prob mid teens max in polls,
I think it was Oliver Callan recently who when mimicking mlmd said...Im going to be taoiseach without actually
doing anything "
 
You seem adamant SF wont be in government here,

I was on a work call yesterday with intelligent people who definitely wouldn't be in favour of SF in government, but even they admitted that its looking likely and they're trying to explain the implications of this to their foreign clients
 

In 2013 the Northern Ireland assembly introduced new laws that banned people with serious criminal convictions from being appointed as special advisers to ministers. The discussions was prompted after Sinn Fein appointed Mary McArdle to an adviser post. She had taken part in the 1984 killing of Mary Travers, a schoolteacher who was shot dead when the IRA attempted to murder her father, Thomas, a Catholic magistrate, as he left Sunday Mass in south Belfast in 1984.

While Sinn Fein opposed the legislation, it eventually appeared to accept it. Except, it didn’t. One such adviser, Aidan McAteer, previously convicted of IRA membership, continued to advise Martin McGuinness, then deputy first minister, after being given a specially created role to oversee and manage Sinn Fein’s special advisers and ministers, sidestepping the legislation by paying his wages with party funds. News of this arrangement came to light during the inquiry into the cash-for-ash scandal.


Fast-forward to 2021 and Simon Coveney, the foreign affairs minister, sparks a furore by appointing Katherine Zappone, a former cabinet colleague, to a cushy special envoy role at the UN with little transparency about the process involved. Sinn Fein said the move smacked of cronyism and eventually put a motion of no confidence down in the foreign affairs minister. Sinn Fein appear to say one thing in Dublin, but do something entirely different in Belfast.
The issue has raised its head again this week when Declan McAleer, the party’s spokesman on agriculture, told the assembly that his party opposed a bill that would ban the hunting of mammals with dogs. Mary Lou McDonald, its leader, has previously said her party would vote in favour of a ban on fox hunting at the “next opportunity”. But when this “next opportunity” arose, the party cited problems in the legislation itself and a lack of time to scrutinise the bill before the next election. While McAleer said the party supported some elements of the bill, there was one line from his remarks that stood out. He said the party “does not agree with a ban on hunting”.
McAleer also said there was a “strong lobby” that considered hunting with dogs to be an important economic and recreational outlet, particularly in rural communities. “We did not take a position on the bill,” he added. Sinn Fein, however, is adamant that it is still in favour of a ban on fox hunting


Speaking before the last election in 2020, McDonald said the party was working on policy in this area. However, when The Times asked for a copy of this policy this week, no response was forthcoming. Louise O’Reilly, the party’s enterprise spokeswoman, said Sinn Fein wanted “heavy legislation” on the sector. So, which is it? Running with the hares and hunting with the hounds surely springs to mind.

There are any number of examples that one can point to where the party does one thing in Belfast and another thing in Dublin. Back in June the taoiseach said Sinn Fein was “politically dishonest” by calling for the abolition of the property tax in the South, while implementing a very similar system in Northern Ireland.



The party has also walked a tightrope on abortion. In the Republic, it ended up giving full-throated support to the repeal campaign, and even suspended two members from the parliamentary party over the issue. But it’s not as simple in the North. Last March it abstained on a bill from the DUP that would have prevented abortions in cases of non-fatal disabilities.

And let’s not forget that McDonald and other senior members from the party in the South attended Bobby Storey’s funeral in June last year during the first wave of the pandemic. But when golfgate happened, the party said it showed the “chaos and dysfunction” at the heart of government.


Does this even matter? Clearly not, according to opinion polls north and south. Sinn Fein can rightly argue that the executive in Northern Ireland is not a fully functioning government with revenue-raising powers, and is subservient to the Treasury and No 10 in London on matters of economic policy. It can also point to working with one of the most conservative political parties in western Europe, in the DUP. Some of its members are creationists. It can also say it is the only major all-island party and some contradictions are to be expected across the jurisdictions.

Sinn Fein voters in the North are more loyal to the party brand than those in the Republic, and are more prepared to accept a strategic fudge around economic issues. A more jaundiced view is that voters on either side of the border don’t know much about the other political jurisdiction, and if they do, they simply don’t care. Southern voters are supporting Sinn Fein based on its promises around housing and taxation and are enthused by their articulate and engaging spokespeople. There is also the view that Sinn Fein voters in the North are more conservative than the left-leaning voters they court in the South, and the party is unwilling to push them any further than is strictly necessary.

Perhaps it is a combination of all of the above with a dash of good luck has made the Sinn Fein “hare and hounds” strategy such a success. But how long could it hold such contradictory positions if it were in government in Dublin?
Top post
 
EVENT GUIDE - HIGHLIGHT
Cornelius Patrick O' Sullivan
The Richmond Revival, College Road, Fermoy, Co. Cork, P61 T292

17th May 2024 @ 7:00 pm
More info..

Casey Black

Coughlan's, Today @ 7:30pm

More events ▼
Top