Russia's unjustifiable war of aggression in Ukraine

I suppose killing 14,000 civilians in the Donbass regions since 2014, nearly all who were Ethnic Russian was not doing something?

Here, go educate yourself, i'll start it slow with you in case you get overloaded, let me know when you want a bit more.





By the way, Ukraine didn't kill 14,000 civilians in Donbas, despite what dictator Putin says. About 15,000 people were killed there between 2014 and 2016, including about 3,400 civilians, 4,500 Ukrainian troops, 6,500 separatist troops, and 500 Russian troops. Note that this was before the Minsk Accords, which the Russians have since violated.

Try again.
 
Situation in Ukraine affects the whole world, no doubt. I am following more and more what is happening in the Central Asia, as I believe this is only a start to the definite collapse of the evil emporium of Russia causing tremendous suffering to all its neighbors last 200 years. Here is extremely interesting post from one of the boards I follow:

I know that I should write this in the Central Asia / Kazakhstan thread, but what is happening is very important in the context of the war in Ukraine because it is the evident weakness of the "nuclear superpower" that has become a destabilizing factor, and any change in the status quo means a weakening of Russia's position. Central Asia are completely ignored in the Polish and Western media on a par with any unrest in Africa, and from our point of view this is a terrible mistake because the region can quickly become the second front. Mirzoyev gave the order to fire at the demonstrators (from 20 to 80 people died depending on the sources) but since Maduro stopped being so bad and Iran is pretty cool guys... an opportunity presents itself to undermine Moscow's position, even at the cost of supporting individuals of dubious reputation. I wrote more than once on the forum) the outbreak of local armed conflicts in 2 years, where Russia will be forced to intervene more or less directly. There are a lot of hot spots. Possible conflicts are (in my subjective opinion about the probability):

-coup / overthrow / civil war in Tajikistan
- Home War / Karakalpak Secession in Uzbekistan
- the Tajik-Kyrgyz war
- Russo-Kazakh war

The entire political scene of the ex-Soviet republics is very complicated and we should discuss practically every country separately, but I will try to literally draw a rough picture of what, where and how, in literally two three sentences.

Azerbaijan- about the 90s in conflict with the Armenians due to the status of Nagorno-Karabakh inhabited by the Armenian population. In addition to political reasons, the region is important in terms of the export of Azerbaijani oil to the west to the ports on the Black Sea, which Baku was striving for because in this matter they were always pressed by Russia. Currently, the Azeris, by intensifying their cooperation with Turkey, have practically broken out of Moscow's influence, regained part of Karabakh and, in accordance with the will of the aliens sultan, are implementing Ankara's policy on the Caspian Sea, which will not leave them passive to the situation in the X-States. Turkey with Azerbaijani hands will want a piece of the cake.

Tajikistan - the country ruled by Rahman and his clique is an evident example of the rule in the "rebellions". Centrally controlled autarky run by the family-party system headed by the omnipotent president. Both the "emperor" and the entire establishment deteriorate over time. more which manifests itself in a progressive decline in the quality of government and the economic crisis. Tajdjikistan was the poorest ex-republic in the 90s, thanks to the opening to China in the 10 years there was a significant improvement in life and economic development, but at the cost of becoming a semicircle of Beijing, which began to hurt the local population (a few from Tashkent get yuan, so they don't care). Recent economic problems have caused a series of pseudo-reforms by Rahman that Maduro himself would not be ashamed of. The situation is particularly dramatic in agriculture, which is on the brink of a precipice, to such an extent that food rationing began in some regions already a year ago, and the harvest prospects for this year are not very positive. Tajikistan cannot afford to import food at abnormal prices in 2022, and the degenerated government, in response to problems, tightens the bolt of the inhabitants and is violently looking for an external enemy (see Kyrgyzstan)

Kyrgyzstan - if I called Tajikistan a semi-colony, Kyrgyzstan is completely divided between all corporations, especially Chinese business and Western mining companies that de facto create a state within a state. Kyrgyzstan has been in a permanent crisis of power since the beginning of the 21st century (three coups / revolutions in 20 years), local warlords (often drenched in trafficking in Afghan heroin) and clan leaders have more say than the legal government. The enormous corruption, lawlessness, ethnic conflicts, poverty and the total awkwardness of the COVID government have made the country barely hold together. the flavor is added by the fact that there was a total collapse of economic emigration to Russia, which for many years was an important source of income for the population. For this we have three external problems: Uyghurs from China are fleeing to Kyrgyzstan and Beijing has complained that "extremist" groups are gathering there, the new prime minister of Kyrgyzstan, Japarov, has a strong nationalist program and emphasizes some ethnic conflicts with Uzbekistan, and there is more and more problems with the "water war" with Tajikistan.

Tajiks produce more than 90% of electricity from hydroelectric power plants and their cotton farming takes a huge amount of them, which leads to regular droughts in the neighbor. In addition, poorly urgulated borders and disputes with Kyrgyz shepherds who drink animals abroad do not make the matter any easier. This year, the situation got so inflamed that there was an exchange of artillery fire between countries in which several people died on both sides.

Sorry if the transaction is not perfect, I am trying my best. More in the next entry (limit)
 
Last edited:
Kazakhstan has been pursuing a policy of independence from Russia and maneuvering between Moscow and Beijing for several years. On the one hand, it is developing relations with the Kremlin, but they remain mainly in the declarative sphere, and in domestic politics, actions are taken against the Russian-speaking population. The turn towards Russia (a request for military intervention by the OSCE), which we saw during the winter during the riots and attempts to overthrow the government, is only an apparent move. Tokayev used the Russian army as a bogeyman for his own army to make them think that he had Moscow's support in his actions, and he was able to finally remove from power the clique of Nazarbayev who was the "eternal president-pensioner" and concentrated all power in his hands. Putin was quite surprised when he heard from Tokayev's mouth: "Thank you for your help and now ... Fuck off" and everything that the new president declared turned out to be a lie - the anti-Russian course will be maintained and even due to the weakness of the Russian Federation in Ukraine it has been intensified. The new government of Kazakhstan felt a moment of history to break out into independence with the perspective of a local power. Tokayev is aware of the weakness of the clan-party-kleptocratic government model typical of the countries of the region, therefore he is trying to lay the foundations of a modern politically active society (how long will the reform be adopted and how long it will be in his hand - another matter), which is to protect Kazakhstan against the return of authoritarianism and the growing influenced by China (anti-Chinese sentiment is strong in Kazakhstan). I expect an intensification of anti-Russian policy, as at present Moscow does not have the strength or means to exert political pressure on Nur Sultan (Astana). Currently, the only way for Russia to be able to put pressure on the Kazakhs is to block the oil port in Novorossiysk, "for technical reasons", where Kazakh oil flows to the world, but this is a problem to be solved - Tokayev has more hooks on the Russians than they do on him: Baikonur, New Silk Road . Export to India and Pakistan.

Uzbekistan - this week there were fights in the eastern part of the country after the government of Mirzoev and his clique wanted to change the constitutions in a manner typical for the region: reset the counter of the president's term of office, give him additional powers, limit self-government and, above all, delete the provision on the possible secession of the autonomy of Karakalpuck. It is true that the region is a deserted salt desert formed after the drying of the Aral Lake, but it occupies 1/3 of the country.

It is worth paying attention to how Mirzojew reacted to the rebellion (another one in a decade): first he bloodily suppressed it and then withdrew from the constitutional changes back, indicating that on the one hand his position in power was inviolable and on the other he noticed that he initially promoted the model of exercising power (party-clan autarky) does not have a long-term raison d'être and does not preclude Kazakhstan to follow the path of liberalization. Attempts are now underway to find other methods of staying in power without such blatant violations of the law

To sum up: Central Asia is one of the most inflammatory regions in the near future. Moscow's weakness will use local forces to reshuffle, be it on the inside or outside. Russia does not have the strength and means to be the main player and its actions will be limited to "damage control". The role of Beijing should not be overestimated - Beijing is not able to improvise quickly and the sleeping Russian mir completely undermined their vision of slowly taking over the Russian sphere of influence, all the more so now that the local factions that use anti-Chinese sentiment for their own purposes are gaining more and more importance. Back to Russia. The war in Ukraine accelerated the next phase of the collapse of the USSR - this is not about the physical collapse of Russia, but the fragmentation of Moscow's sphere of influence. In the first phase we had a loss of control over central Europe, in the second phase the physical disintegration of the USSR, a loss of control over the Baltic countries and a decline in importance in the Balkans. The third phase is the color revolutions (Georgia, Ukraine) and anti-Russian movements in Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan.

Now we have a fourth phase starting with Ukraine and spreading to Central Asia. The question is whether there will be a fifth and sixth phase of the collapse of the alliance, ending with the degeneration of the Russian Federation to the role of a middle class country playing in the second league.

And on PRoC in the topic about Ukraine every day Russian troll posts utter bullshit from Russian propaganda which in many occasions requires response as some other users will take it for granted without hesitation.
 
Last edited:
I need a lie down, Bolek actually admitting that his heroes committed a war crime by using civilians, and elderly, defenceless ones at that as human shields!
According to an ongoing investigation. Wait for the result and if anyone gets taken responsible. Before that STFU.

Btw. The shit you posted is irrelevant. You must be a big fan of following crap telegram accounts.

How is you midget-tzar, did he show his botox face on G20? Yes? No? Why?

The only histeria here is you and you propaganda diarrhea.

Damn, you mentioned Sri Lanka, set a new topic on BRICS you will be able to rage there xD
 
Pssst, the S in BRICS stands for South Africa, NOT Sri Lanka. :lol!::lol!:

We all know you have absolutely no idea what you are commenting 😜
You do not have to prove it with every post. Look at the map, check what country is mostly affected apart from Sri Lanka you clown and then check if that country is not in the acronym you use like mad xD

You have zero knowledge on the topic, and your intellectual abilities, you have demonstrated here multiple times, are not helping either 🤣

Stick to calling me bolek and copy pasting Russian propaganda you midget.
 
To sum up: Central Asia is one of the most inflammatory regions in the near future. Moscow's weakness will use local forces to reshuffle, be it on the inside or outside. Russia does not have the strength and means to be the main player and its actions will be limited to "damage control". The role of Beijing should not be overestimated - Beijing is not able to improvise quickly and the sleeping Russian mir completely undermined their vision of slowly taking over the Russian sphere of influence, all the more so now that the local factions that use anti-Chinese sentiment for their own purposes are gaining more and more importance. Back to Russia. The war in Ukraine accelerated the next phase of the collapse of the USSR - this is not about the physical collapse of Russia, but the fragmentation of Moscow's sphere of influence. In the first phase we had a loss of control over central Europe, in the second phase the physical disintegration of the USSR, a loss of control over the Baltic countries and a decline in importance in the Balkans. The third phase is the color revolutions (Georgia, Ukraine) and anti-Russian movements in Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan.

Now we have a fourth phase starting with Ukraine and spreading to Central Asia. The question is whether there will be a fifth and sixth phase of the collapse of the alliance, ending with the degeneration of the Russian Federation to the role of a middle class country playing in the second league.

And on PRoC in the topic about Ukraine every day Russian troll posts utter bullshit from Russian propaganda which in many occasions requires response as some other users will take it for granted without hesitation.

Putin recognises that this is coming and is effectively trying to hold back the tide, By actually launching a war he has exposed Russia as a great power "paper tiger" and has effectively greatly accelerated its decline. He has failed in the Baltic and is now failing in the Black Sea. China is no friend of Russia and must be drooling over the rich pickings in Asiatic Russia. The Silk Road will be very useful.
 
I've been staying out of here because of the stream of propaganda from all sides but just in case anyone was wondering what the real motives of this war was.
It's like all major wars, it's about resources.
 
Not the resources per se, but ability to cash on them, use as the political tool to control "the Russian sphere" on a scale not even close to what yanks are being accused for and in fact to keep the inefficient Russian system alive, which is a grotesque mixture between autocratic rule and mafia state.

Yes, this would be neo colonialism. Something Russia was accusing everyone around last few decades.
 
Last edited:
EVENT GUIDE - HIGHLIGHT
Stand-up Comedy Club: Earlier Show
The Roundy, Castle St.

15th Jun 2024 @ 6:30 pm
More info..

The Teachers Lounge (12A)

Triskel Arts Centre, Today @ 8pm

More events ▼
Top