no hes not....but he certainly is recapturing his form. i said it in the summer we should have signed him especially with how bitter we were over flamini i think we could have gotten him.
Zidane roulette, back heal and shot.....thats 2 screamers in a week for him. Milan will so regret allowing Bordeaux to buy him at the end of the loan spell! suckas.
arsene wenger has said theo walcott at the same age is better than messi.
thats better than any stuff i ever said about him. even i wouldnt have went that far.
no hes not....but he certainly is recapturing his form. i said it in the summer we should have signed him especially with how bitter we were over flamini i think we could have gotten him.
From what I've seen of both I'd rather have Nasri. He hasn't settled like I expected him to at Arsenal but don't compare how Gourcoff is playing now in France to how Nasri is playing in England.
I'm not saying he isn't class, he is, but I think Nasri is better and will get better for Arsenal.
But Walcott isn't even in the same league as Messi.
From what I've seen of both I'd rather have Nasri. He hasn't settled like I expected him to at Arsenal but don't compare how Gourcoff is playing now in France to how Nasri is playing in England.
I'm not saying he isn't class, he is, but I think Nasri is better and will get better for Arsenal.
But Walcott isn't even in the same league as Messi.
Nasri's got everything to become an arsenal great, im with you on that one but people really tend to overlook Gourcuff...he's only starting showing what he learned in Milan, he's a stratege, a la Zidane , he's got an intelligence and vision of play that only few players have, and like Nasri, he's got a huge potential to get better,
In the long term, if i had to make a decision, i'd have him over Samir.
Regarding Walcott's comparison with Messi. Wenger was on about the movements off the ball (which he praises a lot more than just dribbling skills). On that particular point, yes Walcott's probably better than Messi.
