Why put up a link when you can just put up the article or parts of?
It is 2024 after all.
Whatever Granddad
Why put up a link when you can just put up the article or parts of?
It is 2024 after all.
I was heading to Dublin this morning and sailed through the Dunkettle at 11am.Was taking the Dublin exit this morning and twas backed up past the turnoff from the tunnel at about half 9.
Id hate to be heading that direction at rush hour
I was heading to Dublin this morning and sailed through the Dunkettle at 11am.
*smug look*
I'm in Dublin for 3 days and dreading driving around the city centre.Id rather not ever be on the Dublin road tbh.
While that is arguably true in certain respects, the main issue is that the traffic split is not 50/50 - East/West is more like 75% of the traffic. This causes huge problems at the tunnel westbound as all that traffic is funneled down to 50% of the road space (one lane) approaching the tunnel. Add in the inevitable effects of merging three busy lanes together in a couple of hundred metres and the issue is obvious - inappropriate design. This problem is structural - it cannot be solved while maintaining free flow absent an additional tunnel bore. I think it's a scandal TBH - what was the point of spending quarter of a billion when the experience of the average user has not improved? Those saying it's much better are likely coming from the M8 southbound.All in all they have done a good job on this project with the exception of east to west, they've made a hames of that.
I work in little Island and it's a nightmare anywhere near 4 o clock on wards.
Another problem they didn't factor in was that the increased flow of traffic East-West in the morning through the tunnel just pushes the problem onto Bloomfield which is now a bottleneck most mornings at peak times.While that is arguably true in certain respects, the main issue is that the traffic split is not 50/50 - East/West is more like 75% of the traffic. This causes huge problems at the tunnel westbound as all that traffic is funneled down to 50% of the road space (one lane) approaching the tunnel. Add in the inevitable effects of merging three busy lanes together in a couple of hundred metres and the issue is obvious - inappropriate design. This problem is structural - it cannot be solved while maintaining free flow absent an additional tunnel bore. I think it's a scandal TBH - what was the point of spending quarter of a billion when the experience of the average user has not improved? Those saying it's much better are likely coming from the M8 southbound.
As far as I know, the design of the intersection was worked around the tunnel and its capacity which is now way beyond what it was ever designed for.While that is arguably true in certain respects, the main issue is that the traffic split is not 50/50 - East/West is more like 75% of the traffic. This causes huge problems at the tunnel westbound as all that traffic is funneled down to 50% of the road space (one lane) approaching the tunnel. Add in the inevitable effects of merging three busy lanes together in a couple of hundred metres and the issue is obvious - inappropriate design. This problem is structural - it cannot be solved while maintaining free flow absent an additional tunnel bore. I think it's a scandal TBH - what was the point of spending quarter of a billion when the experience of the average user has not improved? Those saying it's much better are likely coming from the M8 southbound.
Just wait until the M28 traffic is filtering Westbound at Bloomfield, that area will become a car park during the morning rush hour.Another problem they didn't factor in was that the increased flow of traffic East-West in the morning through the tunnel just pushes the problem onto Bloomfield which is now a bottleneck most mornings at peak times.