No need for proof, if everyone is following the rules of the road on that stretch, the cyclist doesn't need to pull in and the motorist does not have the right pass them out.
Cyclist has priority. End of argument.
No need for proof, if everyone is following the rules of the road on that stretch, the cyclist doesn't need to pull in and the motorist does not have the right pass them out.
Jank, who is the one abusing women motorists.
I have not had an argument, I just pointed out that you were bullshitting about what the sign painted on the road meant.
For you the symbol brings awareness of cyclists, now think about it little harder, there's no room to pass here and the motorist doesn't have the right to overtake the cyclist. Now think about it a little harder, the cyclist does not have to pull in. Now think about it harder again, the cyclist has priority on this stretch. You can interpret the symbol whatever way you want, hopefully it's into your head that the cyclist has priority.
You are not understanding (deliberately or otherwise) his point. It's ok take the pwn and move on.
That's for the best, I would too if I got caught out spoofing.
Oh, I understand his interpretation of the symbol. Now tell me why do you think that symbol is there specifically on that stretch? Go on think about it.
At first I thought you were being deliberately obtuse but now I think you actually don't
So you can't answer the question?
