This.You don't.
You know that he, or someone who looked like him, was accused of an offence.
That's what you know.
This.You don't.
You know that he, or someone who looked like him, was accused of an offence.
That's what you know.
Have you given up on the rule of law now too?It is
Exceptions should be made in a situation like this,Have you given up on the rule of law now too?
Of course your shower will come down hard on anyone who assaulted that low life.Have you given up on the rule of law now too?
When it comes to kiddy fiddling and a chance that prick could come up before Nolan, deffo.Have you given up on the rule of law now too?
It is the same guy.You don't.
You know that he, or someone who looked like him, was accused of an offence.
That's what you know.
So yes then.When it comes to kiddy fiddling and a chance that prick could come up before Nolan, deffo.
You do things by the book first. What happens if it endangers the case against him.Exceptions should be made in a situation like this,
Again, you don't know that.It is the same guy.
He deserves everything he gets.
Would you be saying the same if he did it to a child of yours?
Or a relative of yours?
Take it what ever way you want. If you think I'm going to argue that this creep didn't deserve seven bells of shit kicked out of him then you are mistaken.So yes then.
If you only believe in innocent until proven guilty when it suits you then you don't believe in it at all.
