no idea what you mean there?
in any case,it wasnt solely aimed at you,but as i said,in ways,it was also aimed at you.
and the fact that that's what i felt smithy was saying,should explain my posts in themselves?
in any case,its smithy that pointed out/said you were disagreeing with me(in a slight way?)...i honestly wouldnt have picked up on it otherwise!
cant say i cared too much either,tbh...im beyond getting upset at small things these days.
but i still felt i should make it clear that i posted the original thread from use of info,and sight of current trend,rather than speculation.be that from you,or anybody else at all.hope i've cleared that up?
