PROCNA2018
Full Member
I didn't know that. I am amazed that it wwould have been allowed whether it happened or not.Oh ffs, seriously? Go back and read the posts. You do know that he was cover for the Queen as well when she was alive? She never removed him because she couldn't unlike his public appearances. You are worst than Sound_y trying to conflate both arguments.
I am not conflating anything or attempting to.
I am not talking about putting him back in the line of succession.
I am talking about him being precluded from public engagements of any form as any inclusion normalises his behaviour even in the smallest context.
Honestly it is not a big deal for me, I couldn't care less, was just offering an opinion ............I see no reason for why his public profile should be rehabilitated.