Thats not what I'm saying. The tenants have rights and should be allowed return to their apartment within 6 months from eviction at their normal rental amount. Thats the law
So it would best advised for the landlord to take more than 6 months, he is hardly going to invest 3 mill (?) for the same rental return. That would be lunacy
How do you propose the landlord recoups his refurbishment investment? Should he lie the loss himself? How do you know the existing tenants won't get first dibs on the refurbished apartments at the higher rate?
Maybe they will get offered first dibs at the higher rate after the 6 month period, but its unlikey that the landlord will be letting out the apartments in the future as licencing out apartments is becoming more prevalent.
So it would best advised for the landlord to take more than 6 months, he is hardly going to invest 3 mill (?) for the same rental return. That would be lunacy
How many vacant apartments? So you are now dictating how a business should recoup their investment. They own the block and should be entitled to recoup it how they see fit.
How many vacant apartments? So you are now dictating how a business should recoup their investment. They own the block and should be entitled to recoup it how they see fit.
I haven't suggested that they are all victims but you have no idea of the landlords outgoings, costs, overheads. It is very easy to say all landlords are minted and coining it in, I suggest you should try being one as it wouldn't be long opening your eyes. Why did Corbetts offload that apartment block?
A few days ago a landlord was on with Prendepantz after spending 38k doing up a property that he can't rent now because the Council bought the property next door and moved scummers in. You really shouldn't believe all you read on a placard ;-)
