Judge Martin Nolan

This, as usual, makes no fucking sense.

Yes overcrowding is impacting sentencing, but it doesn't mean that no one gets a custodial sentence or there isn't a normal range.

Can you just stop asking me what you think are "clever" questions. Because they are invariably not clever.

Yet again you make no sense arguing against something I neither said nor intimated. Plus ca change :rolleyes:


Nobody said that no one gets a custodial sentence, it's quite obvious that some people still do get custodial sentences. But if, as you seem to be admitting, overcrowding IS impacting on sentencing then it would be logical that it would lead to reduced period of incarceration or to a suspended sentence.

If it was never going to be incarceration anyway, then overcrowding in our prisons wouldn't have any impact one way or another on the sentence - or is that too large a logical step for you?
 
Yet again you make no sense arguing against something I neither said nor intimated. Plus ca change :rolleyes:


Nobody said that no one gets a custodial sentence, it's quite obvious that some people still do get custodial sentences. But if, as you seem to be admitting, overcrowding IS impacting on sentencing then it would be logical that it would lead to reduced period of incarceration or to a suspended sentence.

If it was never going to be incarceration anyway, then overcrowding in our prisons wouldn't have any impact one way or another on the sentence - or is that too large a logical step for you?
There is no fucking logic in any of your post. It is just word salad. A stupid man's notion of what a smart man might sound like.

Any chance you could apologise for incorrectly accusing me of reporting you? I note you are busily ignoring that on the other thread. (apart from the moronic smiley emoji you have to use ever time you are made a fool of)
 
There is no fucking logic in any of your post. It is just word salad. A stupid man's notion of what a smart man might sound like.

Any chance you could apologise for incorrectly accusing me of reporting you? I note you are busily ignoring that on the other thread. (apart from the moronic smiley emoji you have to use ever time you are made a fool of)

You've previous for rebutting various things that I've never said. I never said that nobody gets custodial sentences - they quite clearly do.

But you admitted that overcrowding in prisons DOES impact on sentencing - now it seems you want to try row back from that. And you think your infantile "word salad" accusations will provide you with cover.

If you can't understand what I've actually posted, and prefer instead to dismiss it as "word salad" because of your lack of grasping the written word, that's on you. 😎
 
You've previous for rebutting various things that I've never said. I never said that nobody gets custodial sentences - they quite clearly do.

But you admitted that overcrowding in prisons DOES impact on sentencing - now it seems you want to try row back from that. And you think your infantile "word salad" accusations will provide you with cover.
I haven't rowed back from anything.
If you can't understand what I've actually posted, and prefer instead to dismiss it as "word salad" because of your lack of grasping the written word, that's on you. 😎
You have posted rubbish, as usual.

Ignored this part of the post though.
Any chance you could apologise for incorrectly accusing me of reporting you? I note you are busily ignoring that on the other thread. (apart from the moronic smiley emoji you have to use ever time you are made a fool of)

Are you really that much of a coward?
 
On this thread first let's try deal what you've ignored on this thread - your trying to glibly pretend I said something that I didn't and then trying to dismiss my logical steps that you just couldn't understand or pretended not to understand, as "word salad" :rolleyes:


"Nobody said that no one gets a custodial sentence, it's quite obvious that some people still do get custodial sentences. But if, as you seem to be admitting, overcrowding IS impacting on sentencing then it would be logical that it would lead to reduced period of incarceration or to a suspended sentence.

If it was never going to be incarceration anyway, then overcrowding in our prisons wouldn't have any impact one way or another on the sentence - or is that too large a logical step for you?"
 
On this thread first let's try deal what you've ignored on this thread - your trying to glibly pretend I said something that I didn't and then trying to dismiss my logical steps that you just couldn't understand or pretended not to understand, as "word salad" :rolleyes:


"Nobody said that no one gets a custodial sentence, it's quite obvious that some people still do get custodial sentences. But if, as you seem to be admitting, overcrowding IS impacting on sentencing then it would be logical that it would lead to reduced period of incarceration or to a suspended sentence.

If it was never going to be incarceration anyway, then overcrowding in our prisons wouldn't have any impact one way or another on the sentence - or is that too large a logical step for you?"
Why would I be bothered to discuss anything with you when you won't address this?

Any chance you could apologise for incorrectly accusing me of reporting you? I note you are busily ignoring that on the other thread. (apart from the moronic smiley emoji you have to use ever time you are made a fool of)
 
Why would I be bothered to discuss anything with you when you won't address this?

Any chance you could apologise for incorrectly accusing me of reporting you? I note you are busily ignoring that on the other thread. (apart from the moronic smiley emoji you have to use ever time you are made a fool of)

Let me understand you here - you'll refuse to answer on a thread questions put to you on the same thread, until you get your way on a topic on a different thread? :oops:
 
Let me understand you here - you'll refuse to answer on a thread questions put to you on the same thread, until you get your way on a topic on a different thread? :oops:
You've dodged the question on the other thread.

Just like you are dodging it in this thread.

I find it amusing to watch you display your cowardice so publicly though.
 
You've dodged the question on the other thread.

Just like you are dodging it in this thread.

I find it amusing to watch you display your cowardice so publicly though.

I find it amusing to watch you go to great lengths to deny things that were never said. You've so much previous for it on PROC that one can only conclude that you're like that in real life too.

The one dodging on this thread is you - and you know it, and all your "word salad" accusations and cheerleading from toadies won't hide that fact.

But just for brevity, if you agree to answer the question I put to you on this thread here on this thread, I'll address your other concern. But given your rank cowardice I think you'll avoid it. Yet again.
 
EVENT GUIDE - HIGHLIGHT
Set Dancing & Sean Nós Dancing Classes
Presentation Secondary School Ballyphehane

19th Nov 2024 @ 8:00 pm
More info..

Not How When!

The Pav, Tomorrow @ 9pm

More events ▼
Top