Global Warming

[pubwithnobeer]

Sure what would 97% of the worlds scientists know about this kind of thing, best to put your faith in your own gut instinct on this one I reckon.

Or that article you read on the INTERNET

Did you even read the article?

 

[an liathroid beag]

You mean 97% but that figure is questionable.

http://www.nationalreview.com/artic...ge-no-its-not-97-percent-consensus-ian-tuttle

We wont fight about 2% but 2 degrees C is another matter!

 

[pubwithnobeer]

We wont fight about 2% but 2 degrees C is another matter!

Yeah, carry on believing the bullshit they're feeding you.

 

[an liathroid beag]

Yeah, carry on believing the bullshit they're feeding you.

I read some articles from the National Review from which you quoted. They are very anti any alternatives to the oil industry. Multiple articles pour scorn on solar energy, electric cars and on Obamas efforts to promote alternatives to fossil fuels. They try to make a good case for the oil industry--just saying like

Political views Of the National Review
Victor Davis Hanson, a regular contributor since 2001, sees a broad spectrum of conservative, anti-liberal contributors:

In other words, a wide conservative spectrum — paleo-conservatives, neo-conservatives, tea-party enthusiasts, the deeply religious and the agnostic, both libertarians and social conservatives, free-marketeers and the more protectionist — characterizes National Review. The common requisite is that they present their views as a critique of prevailing liberal orthodoxy but do so analytically and with decency and respect.]
The magazine has been described as "the bible of American conservatism".[28

 

[Roxetten]

I read some articles from the National Review from which you quoted. They are very anti any alternatives to the oil industry. Multiple articles pour scorn on solar energy, electric cars and on Obamas efforts to promote alternatives to fossil fuels. They try to make a good case for the oil industry--just saying like

Political views Of the National Review
Victor Davis Hanson, a regular contributor since 2001, sees a broad spectrum of conservative, anti-liberal contributors:

In other words, a wide conservative spectrum — paleo-conservatives, neo-conservatives, tea-party enthusiasts, the deeply religious and the agnostic, both libertarians and social conservatives, free-marketeers and the more protectionist — characterizes National Review. The common requisite is that they present their views as a critique of prevailing liberal orthodoxy but do so analytically and with decency and respect.]
The magazine has been described as "the bible of American conservatism".[28

Nice pwnage.

 

[Eoin]

Yeah, carry on believing the bullshit they're feeding you.

Says the lad posting links to a conservative mouthpiece

 

[an liathroid beag]

Nice pwnage.

Brilliant " the echo chamber and the denial machine" The tobacco industry should study this approach

 

[pubwithnobeer]

Brilliant " the echo chamber and the denial machine" The tobacco industry should study this approach

Not many deny climate change as it is always changing.

 

[an liathroid beag]

Not many deny climate change as it is always changing.

Changing position,just like the weather

 

[pubwithnobeer]

Changing position,just like the weather

What are you on about the climate is always changing. The fear mongering that we are causing it is baloney.