Not really, it's a passive investment and crowds out individual owners.
There's an entire sub category of economics devoted to how bad an Idea it is to build your society around it.
en.m.wikipedia.org
"Rentier capitalism describes the economic practice of gaining large profits without contributing to society.[1][2][3] A rentier is someone who earns income from capital without working. This is generally done through ownership of assets that generate yield (cash generated by assets), such as rental properties, shares in dividend paying companies, or bonds that pay interest.[4]
Modern economists agree that the power dynamics of the rentier-tenant relationship are oppressive,[5][6] but capitalist theories such as the natural "euthanasia of the rentier" famously put forth by John Maynard Keynes have been abandoned in light of the increase in rent-seeking behavior seen over the past century"
Basically, having lots of people earning large amounts of money by just having lots of money and contributing fuck all to society is generally a bad thing.
I will also admit to having previously been a landlord, so I think I can safely assert that this isn't about criticising individuals as such, it's criticising structures in society that support the inequality rentier capitalism exacerbates.
Also, on the landlord thing, the famine has had somewhat of a cultural influence on that front...