Spezia worth a small few bob I'd say. Different Napoli team to the one that beat Liverpool.
On and off. I've got far too many betting podcasts lined up to possibly keep up with. A decent problem to have though.
Send some recommendations my way please.
Cheers Phil, there's a good few of those there I'm not aware of . Only found out Tom Brownlee does the Bashcast this morning on twitter btw.Following up on this
You've probably got a lot of these on rotation already? But might be a couple of new ones for interest
No way I could keep up with all of these, so tend to scan the description & listen to the ones which look promising
General theory / systems podcasts
Business of Betting
Football Betting Podcasts (good for lower league UK games)
Inside Betting (w/ Matthew Trenhaile - no new episodes in over 1yr, but good back catalog)
The Bashcast
The Smart Betting Club podcast
Trademate Sports Betting Podcast
Weekly tips style podcasts
Matchbook Betting Podcast
Oddschecker Betting Show (tend to listen to the ante-post style ones)
Pinnacle Podcast (tend to listen to the ante-post style ones)
Betfair Betting Podcast
The Trampled Bet Football Betting Podcast
Others (some are more investment/trading than betting)
The Boxing Betting Show
Gambling with an Edge (mostly vegas related, but occasional nugget around US sports betting)
Chat with Traders
Risk of Ruin
The "I hung up on Warren Buffett" podcast
Saw this on twitter, and went and had a look on oddschecker. The disparity in prices is enormous. He's as good as 7.0 with Unibet, and as low as 1.91 with PP/BF (I checked as sometimes Oddschecker is wrong).
Yeah, that treble might be worth a euro or two alright if Milner starts.That's tasty alright. Will have a nibble.
Surprised to see Daley Blind is a big price (7/1 with Unibet, 13/2 with B365).
If you backed Timber, Blind & Milner seperately with even stakes you'd be in profit if any of the 3 saw a card. Looks tempting. 250/1 the trio ;-)
Only thing I can think of is some books want to be seen to be offering the market but couldn't be bothered to do a proper risk assessment on certain (or all) players.Anyone any thoughts on the difference in price. One is saying there's a 51 % chance he'll be booked and the other is just 14%.
Yeah, that makes sense.Only thing I can think of is some books want to be seen to be offering the market but couldn't be bothered to do a proper risk assessment on certain (or all) players.