When i read about the evidence not being allowed.I wondered why the prosecution could have f*cked up in the first place.Hard to know if there was other evidence outside of what was refused.It doesn't appear to be,so the case was always a bit thin on evidence.Up the north they had transcripts read out from records on the lads 'whats app' messages.Dodgey stuff nowadays,you can be traced anywhere at anytime nowadays.
It is, didn't Graham Dwyer get caught out over over phone records too?
I'd be very wary about how the WhatsApp messages in that northern case are interpreted though. Like there's nothing illegal about telling your mates about your sexual exploits, so it would seem to me that that information is included to impugn the character of these fellas.
Also, if you had just raped a woman, would you go around telling people? Doesn't sound like too tense a situation if they were happy to boast about it to their mates.