Tbh I'm done replying to you as it IS going around in circles. You don't think it is a good idea, fair enough. As it is being done already on a small scale just needs increasing, I think it is a good idea and you won't change my mind on that.You can arrive in Dublin Airport and lose your passport somewhere between the plane and border control and still be let in.
You send the migrant back over the border, they get on another bus and get past the checkpoint the next time.
It would seriously inconvenience all the people who cross the border everyday and have been doing so for years.
The much fought for all-island economy and socio-economic links between North and South are even more developed now than they were during the Troubles.
People do not want to go back 30 years and we would be an international laughing stock all over some asylum seekers.
How exactly are you going to patrol all the many back roads and fields that crisscross the border?
They can across the channel in a small dingy so it would not even be a challenge to them.
We once had 2 highly armed armies and 2 police forces trying to stop people crossing the border for 30+ years and they couldn't stop it.
Any small few checks would only be tokenistic and more importantly ineffective.
Back in the day when I was driving coaches across to the UK and indeed The Continent.It is not a transport companies responsibility in the first place.
We cannot have a border with checkpoints for too many reasons.
Random checkpoints are pointless and would rightly be only seen as ineffective and tokenistic.
Again the issue here is we have to rely on the public and civil service for the above.Because no one wants a closed border with checkpoints.
Apart from the Unionists of course.
No point increasing the frequency of checks for the sake of it as the border has to be 100% secure to have any effect.
Tackle it bi-laterally with the next U.K. Govt.
Multi-laterally at E.U. level.
Control all the things that we can control at interactions to speed up asylum seekers claims and appeals etc.
Increase deportations.
Communication at a diplomatic level to foreigners thinking of coming here and rigoursly enforce the laws here at points of entry.
And again ,notice the bridge in the background. Perhaps you're data is incorrect Stacey, what a shock ?
It is a good idea but impossible for too many reasons.Tbh I'm done replying to you as it IS going around in circles. You don't think it is a good idea, fair enough. As it is being done already on a small scale just needs increasing, I think it is a good idea and you won't change my mind on that.
Stacey's estimated crowd of 473.
Another dense thicko on "ignore"And again ,notice the bridge in the background. Perhaps you're data is incorrect Stacey, what shock ?
Wow.They will eventually have to take a far harder line on immigration, its not a question of if, it is of when.