Lickmyleftone
Full Member
Weren't they questioning your (alleged by your partner) trouble with temper though? Not just a general "people with autism have temper tantrums" line. Also, they were entitled to comment on it. Not only entitled, but obliged to.
It isn't abut fault, it is about assessing the impact of any personality trait or disability on the welfare of the child.
If you were in a wheelchair you would be questioned on how you proposed to manage the day to day care of a child taking that into account. That wouldn't be saying it was your fault that you were in a wheelchair.
The "temper tantrums" came up because the judge said it.
As I said, I was making a point around the perception of autism and was surprised at the attitudes of supposed educated people. It's something I find is throughout society.
I could easily speak about other settings where I've witnessed and experienced it.
It's also amazing that people forget that regardless of when diagnosed, you're autistic since birth.
My point is about the perception of autism not the legal system.
I used the legal system as an example of the perception of autism.