http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-26482599
Another one for the left to answer, and no one willing to speak out (as with the Rochdale Child grooming) for fear of being branded by the Left who have questions to answer and want debate shut down.
4,085 fines given to cyclists in just over a month in a safety campaign in London.
Just goes to show, as soon as the authorities pay attention, cyclists are not as innocent as they like to make out!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-25618915
The usual story when it comes to cyclist deaths:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-25591368
But safety should be ignored at the expense of convenience, according to the PROC cyclists!
Ok, my apologies for the delay this year, hols were the priority, but now I'm back the biggest INTERNET event of the year must take place
Nominations will be taken from now. 2 nominations with reasons will make a poll entry. Nominations will be open until midnight on Sunday the 22nd of Dec, or...
So the overall opinion is, safety be damned, convenience is king. Unfortunately it's a prevailing attitude in cyclists in general, and none of you see the problem with it.
At least I'll be kept in a job I guess
Ok, so there are some with flaws, how about the ones which don't have flaws yet are ignored at tge expense of both the cyclists safety and that of other road users?
So you accept that there are roads that shouldn't be cycled? That's a start.
So should there be a fine for cyclists who cycle on the road where a concurrent cycle route exists? Considering those lanes have been put their for a reason.