That your excuse as well? ?
Drucker lives rent-free in his heads.
That your excuse as well? ?
how is it such a jump in logic to reverse engineer this practice to keep the roads safer for everybody?
Why is it a disgrace? Bus lanes make alot of sense and improves service for commuters. Do you know how many trees were removed for the Fermoy/Mitchelstown bypass, or even how many so far have been removed for the new Ringaskiddy route.
Must all road improvements be rerouted because of trees? That makes no cost sense at all.
According to *ank there weren't going to be as many as the reported number of trees cut down to facilitate cycling in from places like Carrigaline at the expense of those living in the city.
Tough titty *ank. ?
Great idea, and if the money was ring-fenced for upkeep of cycle lanes I don't think even the lycra-loonies could complain.
"Same logic" - what a langerHow many pedestrians have wheels installed and pose a danger to other pedestrians if they collide with them?
If pedestrians demanded and were given a space in the traffic lanes for their use as well as the footpaths then you'd have the same logic. But pedestrians don't demand to have a set aside area
Proper order. Ticket them into compliance with the rules of the road.
Hadn’t seen this before
Gas, all the false sentiment about cutting a few trees. Cut the tree and plant it elsewhere. There would be no progress if we listened to these ghouls.Why is it a disgrace? Bus lanes make alot of sense and improves service for commuters. Do you know how many trees were removed for the Fermoy/Mitchelstown bypass, or even how many so far have been removed for the new Ringaskiddy route.
Must all road improvements be rerouted because of trees? That makes no cost sense at all.