★
DAON-PHOBLACHT
CHORCAÍ
Home
baile
Forums
fóraim
Tickets
ceol
Event Guide
Imeachtaí
Street Art
ealaíon sráide
Articles
ailt
Cork Slang
béarlagair
Contact
teagmháil
Shop
siopa
Articles
Cork Slang
Forums
Events
Shop
Gwan
Order search results by
Date of last reply
Date thread created
Order search results by
Current events
Archive
Home
Forums
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Sports Forum
The Official Liverpool Thread - Part 2
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Orchard thief" data-source="post: 7428175" data-attributes="member: 41458"><p>Lol. </p><p>Fail of a post.</p><p></p><p>On a serious note though Greg, I’m a little bit concerned about the reasons I’ve read for his appointment. </p><p></p><p>It’s basically that the his preferred style of play is closest to what suits the current playing staff. </p><p></p><p>Bit of a red flag tbh. Liverpool have been playing the same 4-3-3 system now for 8+ years and the only tactical changes being the inverting full back experiment. </p><p></p><p>Even with Klopp’s side the drop off from the functional athletic midfield of Henderson/Wijnaldum/Fabinho supporting the full backs supplying prime Salah/Firmino/Mane to what they’re at now is frightening. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Of those 8 positions possibly only McAllister is an improvement from todays team. </p><p></p><p>Amorim supposedly preferred a 3 at the back type set up. So what like? </p><p></p><p>The manager should decide the tactics really. </p><p></p><p>Looks like lfc are going to try the “cleverest boys in the room” schtick again. </p><p></p><p>The Klopp appointment wasn’t a thinking outside of the box decision. </p><p></p><p>He already had a very good reputation with what he’d achieved at Dortmund and given the state of the club when he took over, convincing him to take the role when he was hot property was very lucky. </p><p></p><p>The Slot appointed is a gigantic risk by Edwards. And it suggests there’s not going to be a drastic rebuild given they’ve basically picked him to work with whats already there.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Orchard thief, post: 7428175, member: 41458"] Lol. Fail of a post. On a serious note though Greg, I’m a little bit concerned about the reasons I’ve read for his appointment. It’s basically that the his preferred style of play is closest to what suits the current playing staff. Bit of a red flag tbh. Liverpool have been playing the same 4-3-3 system now for 8+ years and the only tactical changes being the inverting full back experiment. Even with Klopp’s side the drop off from the functional athletic midfield of Henderson/Wijnaldum/Fabinho supporting the full backs supplying prime Salah/Firmino/Mane to what they’re at now is frightening. Of those 8 positions possibly only McAllister is an improvement from todays team. Amorim supposedly preferred a 3 at the back type set up. So what like? The manager should decide the tactics really. Looks like lfc are going to try the “cleverest boys in the room” schtick again. The Klopp appointment wasn’t a thinking outside of the box decision. He already had a very good reputation with what he’d achieved at Dortmund and given the state of the club when he took over, convincing him to take the role when he was hot property was very lucky. The Slot appointed is a gigantic risk by Edwards. And it suggests there’s not going to be a drastic rebuild given they’ve basically picked him to work with whats already there. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Sports Forum
The Official Liverpool Thread - Part 2
Top