Take this for example. When Brighton were looking at options to replace Bissouma it was by no means a no-brainer that Caicedo, who they got in pro-actively before Bissouma moved on, would slot in and quickly perform to a very similar level.
Trying to sell Caicedo as the solution to Man Utd's DM woes, at that point in time, would be tougher again. No matter how many selectively edited youtube compilatons were on offer.
It's a compelling narrative but I don't buy the "big clubs are dumb" line. City, Liverpool & Arsenal have very sophisticated analytics teams and I hear Man Utd have bumped up their investment in that area too.
To a large degree where you are on the food chain can dictate the % of your buys that are in the potential bargain category. An interesting section of
Rory's Smith book on xG related to Arsenal. It outlined how the owner of StatDNA ultimately convinced Wenger to greenlight Arsenal's purchase of the company by outlining how StatDNA's analytics would've raised some big red flags recommending against buying Marouane Chamakh and Park Chu-young.
I reckon we'll increasingly see big clubs parking young prospects at clubs within their network (e.g. City Football Group) and letting them sink or swim there before deciding to bring them back to the mothership at unsurprisingly modest fees. So big clubs can have their cake & eat it.
Caveat: Caicedo's stats are adjusted (downwards) because of the quality gap between the top tier in Ecuador vs England