★
DAON-PHOBLACHT
CHORCAÍ
Home
baile
Forums
fóraim
Tickets
ceol
Event Guide
Imeachtaí
Street Art
ealaíon sráide
Articles
ailt
Cork Slang
béarlagair
Contact
teagmháil
Shop
siopa
Articles
Cork Slang
Forums
Events
Shop
Gwan
Order search results by
Date of last reply
Date thread created
Order search results by
Current events
Archive
Home
Forums
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
The Langers Forum
The Action Plan for Housing.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SoundMan" data-source="post: 7421876" data-attributes="member: 28532"><p>I never said they were all lying - the one fixated on proving you were or were not a solicitor was you, and you got very easily wound up about it. You insisted you'd be allowed send me proof that you were. So I relented and sent you an email address. Then you got even more publicly irate when that email address didn't have my name in it. So to try play fair I sent you my RL name. And what did you send as "proof" - an out of date court card with the name redacted, and photo redacted. It could have been anyone's card, and even if it was yours it didn't prove that you're a solicitor, merely that you'd access to the court.</p><p></p><p>Now are you going to name the bet that you claimed I lost and refused to pay out on or will we just put that down as yet another of your lies here?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SoundMan, post: 7421876, member: 28532"] I never said they were all lying - the one fixated on proving you were or were not a solicitor was you, and you got very easily wound up about it. You insisted you'd be allowed send me proof that you were. So I relented and sent you an email address. Then you got even more publicly irate when that email address didn't have my name in it. So to try play fair I sent you my RL name. And what did you send as "proof" - an out of date court card with the name redacted, and photo redacted. It could have been anyone's card, and even if it was yours it didn't prove that you're a solicitor, merely that you'd access to the court. Now are you going to name the bet that you claimed I lost and refused to pay out on or will we just put that down as yet another of your lies here? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
The Langers Forum
The Action Plan for Housing.
Top