Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Hank Scorpio" data-source="post: 7038337" data-attributes="member: 48482">I&#039;ve also read that of the current board&#039;s* decisions , there have been 32 judicial reviews and 30 of those have overturned the planning boards decision.Thats an astonishingly high percentage (93.75%) and seriously calls into question the basis of their decision making.I understand the current audit underway is examining their planning appeals for conflict of interests. You would wonder just how many terrible calls have been made by this board.Hyde is maintaining that in one of the cases under investigation that he didn&#039;t realise it was his brothers house when he intervened to allow planning to be granted .That stretches credibity and it is far more likely that he brought it to the chairs attention only when he realised the on the ditch website was blowing the whistle on his dodgy dealing.I agree that the current board should be disbanded. The public cannot have any confidence in their decision making. At the very least there have been many severe breaches of the boards code of conduct and from the sounds of things Hyde and Fagan have broken the law under the section 148 of the Planning and Development act 2000 which specifically addresses the alleged conflict of interest.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Hank Scorpio, post: 7038337, member: 48482"] I've also read that of the current board's* decisions , there have been 32 judicial reviews and 30 of those have overturned the planning boards decision. Thats an astonishingly high percentage (93.75%) and seriously calls into question the basis of their decision making. I understand the current audit underway is examining their planning appeals for conflict of interests. You would wonder just how many terrible calls have been made by this board. Hyde is maintaining that in one of the cases under investigation that he didn't realise it was his brothers house when he intervened to allow planning to be granted .That stretches credibity and it is far more likely that he brought it to the chairs attention only when he realised the on the ditch website was blowing the whistle on his dodgy dealing. I agree that the current board should be disbanded. The public cannot have any confidence in their decision making. At the very least there have been many severe breaches of the boards code of conduct and from the sounds of things Hyde and Fagan have broken the law under the section 148 of the Planning and Development act 2000 which specifically addresses the alleged conflict of interest. [/QUOTE]

Verification