The objectors cannot have it both ways and if he is stopped re-developing his property then what should he do?
Just let it decline and not make a return?
Build first and apply for planning later? That's not how it's done stacky and you know that.
The objectors cannot have it both ways and if he is stopped re-developing his property then what should he do?
Just let it decline and not make a return?
Build?Build first and apply for planning later? That's not how it's done stacky and you know that.
Build?
Without planning permission?
What bank would even finance a project without planning permission?
Just a bit which is why people do not even attempt is as they could be forced to demolish whatever they built as there was a case in the paper last week ording a family to demolish their home that did not have planning.It's all abit risky, isn't it
Ya I saw that, to be fair I'd be annoyed too. they got pre-planning approval before they bought the site, then submitted their planning application for a bungalow only to get refused. The couple built a house 3 or 4 times as big as originally planned without permission, as a big fuck you to the local authority.Just a bit which is why people do not even attempt is as they could be forced to demolish whatever they built as there was a case in the paper last week ording a family to demolish their home that did not have planning.
Thomas Gould says the reason people are upset is because of lack of services in the village and because the owner will make a profit!! Ffs does he think the owner should give away the property?Why should any community think they can have a say or veto ove who lives in their midsts? That's pure bollox.
The development is perceived as been driven solely by profit, and no concerns given to the migrants and the community itself. Maybe the migrants will be evaluated and one of them is a doctorThomas Gould says the reason people are upset is because of lack of services in the village and because the owner will make a profit!! Ffs does he think the owner should give away the property?
It's Thomas Gould.........of course he doesThomas Gould says the reason people are upset is because of lack of services in the village and because the owner will make a profit!! Ffs does he think the owner should give away the property?