★
DAON-PHOBLACHT
CHORCAÍ
Home
baile
Forums
fóraim
Tickets
ceol
Event Guide
Imeachtaí
Street Art
ealaíon sráide
Articles
ailt
Cork Slang
béarlagair
Contact
teagmháil
Shop
siopa
Articles
Cork Slang
Forums
Events
Shop
Lamp
Order search results by
Date of last reply
Date thread created
Order search results by
Current events
Archive
Home
Forums
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
The Langers Forum
Deirdre Morley v Alan Hawe..
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Matlock" data-source="post: 7155706" data-attributes="member: 4732"><p>See, that's a question I am happy to answer! I'd rather my kids not be brought into it though. Not because of you, but because of some other gowls on here. </p><p></p><p>I don't think it would be feasible to set the probability at zero. We don't do that for people who are convicted of murder, so it would seem entirely unfair to set it as such in this case where she hasn't been convicted of murder. Any release is likely to be on the basis of her engaging with psychiatric services and remaining medicated. That can't bring the probability to zero, but it can probably minimise it. I know in the UK that a condition of release in such cases is often weekly blood tests to ensure medication compliance. I assume the same would be possible here. </p><p></p><p>FWIW, I feel far more sympathy for her husband than I do for her. I just don't wish to see her punished as if she were culpable. </p><p></p><p>I think her chances of release as zero at present. There is a small chance of temp release, but very slim i'd say. As far as I can see, it is a bit like the process of parole. Qualifying to apply for parole rarely if ever means that parole will be granted at that time.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Matlock, post: 7155706, member: 4732"] See, that's a question I am happy to answer! I'd rather my kids not be brought into it though. Not because of you, but because of some other gowls on here. I don't think it would be feasible to set the probability at zero. We don't do that for people who are convicted of murder, so it would seem entirely unfair to set it as such in this case where she hasn't been convicted of murder. Any release is likely to be on the basis of her engaging with psychiatric services and remaining medicated. That can't bring the probability to zero, but it can probably minimise it. I know in the UK that a condition of release in such cases is often weekly blood tests to ensure medication compliance. I assume the same would be possible here. FWIW, I feel far more sympathy for her husband than I do for her. I just don't wish to see her punished as if she were culpable. I think her chances of release as zero at present. There is a small chance of temp release, but very slim i'd say. As far as I can see, it is a bit like the process of parole. Qualifying to apply for parole rarely if ever means that parole will be granted at that time. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
The Langers Forum
Deirdre Morley v Alan Hawe..
Top