★
DAON-PHOBLACHT
CHORCAÍ
Home
baile
Forums
fóraim
Tickets
ceol
Event Guide
Imeachtaí
Street Art
ealaíon sráide
Articles
ailt
Cork Slang
béarlagair
Contact
teagmháil
Shop
siopa
Articles
Cork Slang
Forums
Events
Shop
Lamp
Order search results by
Date of last reply
Date thread created
Order search results by
Current events
Archive
Home
Forums
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
The Langers Forum
Deirdre Morley v Alan Hawe..
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CaptainSensible" data-source="post: 7155698" data-attributes="member: 34104"><p>I assume the whole process will not be just whether she is deemed sane or otherwise, but would also take into consideration the likelihood that she could/would relapse. It was long odds that she reached such a low point but the consequences were horrific and it is probably also long odds that she may reach such a point again.</p><p></p><p>So the point of my question was what would you consider an acceptable risk for her release, 100/1, 1000/1 or is any probability (not matter how low) of a relapse too high having seen the carnage caused?</p><p></p><p>I know you have sympathy for the woman, but if she could not help her actions and thus was not responsible can you really justify her release based on her mental state at a particular point in time, knowing what happened the last time she lost control? </p><p></p><p>I don't think they'll release her or at least not for many a year, what is your opinion on her chances of being released?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CaptainSensible, post: 7155698, member: 34104"] I assume the whole process will not be just whether she is deemed sane or otherwise, but would also take into consideration the likelihood that she could/would relapse. It was long odds that she reached such a low point but the consequences were horrific and it is probably also long odds that she may reach such a point again. So the point of my question was what would you consider an acceptable risk for her release, 100/1, 1000/1 or is any probability (not matter how low) of a relapse too high having seen the carnage caused? I know you have sympathy for the woman, but if she could not help her actions and thus was not responsible can you really justify her release based on her mental state at a particular point in time, knowing what happened the last time she lost control? I don't think they'll release her or at least not for many a year, what is your opinion on her chances of being released? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
The Langers Forum
Deirdre Morley v Alan Hawe..
Top