★
DAON-PHOBLACHT
CHORCAÍ
Home
baile
Forums
fóraim
Tickets
ceol
Event Guide
Imeachtaí
Street Art
ealaíon sráide
Articles
ailt
Cork Slang
béarlagair
Contact
teagmháil
Shop
siopa
Articles
Cork Slang
Forums
Events
Shop
Lamp
Order search results by
Date of last reply
Date thread created
Order search results by
Current events
Archive
Home
Forums
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
The Langers Forum
Chile rejected new left wing constitution
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="catcha" data-source="post: 7099936" data-attributes="member: 49798"><p>Sorry mate, I pretty doubt you actually know what was proposed, and why it was turned down. You know why? Their new Constitution basically would fit in EVERY single motion you have put on PROC when trying to discuss some serious topics with your whataboutism.</p><p></p><p>Just some of it (AP):</p><p></p><p><em>The 388-article proposed charter, besides focusing on social issues and the environment, also introduced rights to free education, health care and housing. It would have established autonomous Indigenous territories and recognized a parallel justice system in those areas, although lawmakers would decide how far-reaching that would be.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>The proposed document was the first in the world to be written by a convention split equally between male and female delegates, but critics said it was too long, lacked clarity and went too far in some of its measures, which included characterising Chile as a plurinational state, establishing autonomous Indigenous territories, and prioritising the environment and gender parity.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>In contrast, the current constitution is a market-friendly document that favors the private sector over the state in aspects like education, pensions and health care. It also makes no reference to the country’s Indigenous population, which makes up almost 13% of the population.</em></p><p></p><p>Have a nice day <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>PS. It was known it will be rejected before the draft was even ready, the only question was with what margin <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="catcha, post: 7099936, member: 49798"] Sorry mate, I pretty doubt you actually know what was proposed, and why it was turned down. You know why? Their new Constitution basically would fit in EVERY single motion you have put on PROC when trying to discuss some serious topics with your whataboutism. Just some of it (AP): [I]The 388-article proposed charter, besides focusing on social issues and the environment, also introduced rights to free education, health care and housing. It would have established autonomous Indigenous territories and recognized a parallel justice system in those areas, although lawmakers would decide how far-reaching that would be. The proposed document was the first in the world to be written by a convention split equally between male and female delegates, but critics said it was too long, lacked clarity and went too far in some of its measures, which included characterising Chile as a plurinational state, establishing autonomous Indigenous territories, and prioritising the environment and gender parity. In contrast, the current constitution is a market-friendly document that favors the private sector over the state in aspects like education, pensions and health care. It also makes no reference to the country’s Indigenous population, which makes up almost 13% of the population.[/I] Have a nice day :) PS. It was known it will be rejected before the draft was even ready, the only question was with what margin ;) [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
The Langers Forum
Chile rejected new left wing constitution
Top