United - Liverpool net spending in Modern Times

[Instabroke]

Adjusted for inflation Fergie spent £3.5 billion on transfers, stunning considering a lot of 'the' team came through the youth system.

 

[Nollaig O Muracu]

Adjusted for inflation Fergie spent £3.5 billion on transfers, stunning considering a lot of 'the' team came through the youth system.

Link?

And if he did, then Liverpool spent more. And won one major trophy.

 

[Corkonian1]

Adjusted for inflation Fergie spent £3.5 billion on transfers, stunning considering a lot of 'the' team came through the youth system.

True! Along with Cantona winning the title as the main front man for Leeds and Fergie buying him up, it was only then the drought of 7 years for Fergie and his boys came to an end. Klopp had the Champions League and Premier League won inside 5 years.

 

[Handy Run]

I'd like to see the methodology for that sum and have it compared to other clubs

 

[Nollaig O Muracu]

Highest-spending Premier League bosses with Klopp now above Ferguson

Jurgen Klopp has spent heavily this summer in a bid to boost Liverpool's squad, with the German now ahead of legendary Manchester United boss Sir Alex Ferguson with the amount he has payed out

www.mirror.co.uk

Not all about money

 

[Philby]

Highest-spending Premier League bosses with Klopp now above Ferguson

Jurgen Klopp has spent heavily this summer in a bid to boost Liverpool's squad, with the German now ahead of legendary Manchester United boss Sir Alex Ferguson with the amount he has payed out

www.mirror.co.uk

Not all about money

Fail. What an entirely pointless article m8.

Pretending that a pound spent in 1993 has the same value as a pound spent over 30 years later.

 

[Nollaig O Muracu]

Fail. What an entirely pointless article m8.

Pretending that a pound spent in 1993 has the same value as a pound spent over 30 years later.

True.

It's like pretending that Liverpool are not a powerhouse of a football club that can outspend all but 5 or 6 clubs in the world, isn't it?

This means more.

 

[Handy Run]

Fail. What an entirely pointless article m8.

Pretending that a pound spent in 1993 has the same value as a pound spent over 30 years later.

Manconomics, innit

 

[Philby]

True.

It's like pretending that Liverpool are not a powerhouse of a football club that can outspend all but 5 or 6 clubs in the world, isn't it?

This means more.

You're deflecting as much as Carra did on the pitch in his prime

tbh I'd imagine Klopp has a lower net spend than far more than 5 or 6 clubs during his tenure, but that's not really the point he was making.

I assume he was commenting on the relative cost to assemble the Liverpool XI who finished the game, and won, relative to the Chelsea XI...no?

 

[Corkonian1]

Fail. What an entirely pointless article m8.

Pretending that a pound spent in 1993 has the same value as a pound spent over 30 years later.

Spot on!

The article ironically even pinpoints two Liverpool players Van Dijk and Nunez who were both individually cheaper than Maguire.