Hank Scorpio
Full Member
Just how utterly predictable you are.
No more than yourself Dan.Just how utterly predictable you are.
No more than yourself Dan.
3 and a half years for killing an unarmed man is a very reasonable sentence. He acted in self defence, but used excessive violence to do so. Hence the sentence.
As both the jury and the judge ( who actually heard all the evidence) found.
Poor predictable Matty.
Lol, poor predictable Matty.
Indeed.8.59 'cue some spazzer who worked as a solicitor defending this bollocks'
9.23
Poor predictable Matty.
Let me phrase it this way....3 and a half years for killing an unarmed man is a very reasonable sentence. He acted in self defence, but used excessive violence to do so. Hence the sentence.
As both the jury and the judge ( who actually heard all the evidence) found.
Let me phrase it this way....
3 and a half years for defending himself and his mother against a violent attacker who entered their home
Self defence is a full defence if the force used is proportionate. It is a partial defence if the force used is excessive, as in this case.Let me phrase it this way....
3 and a half years for defending himself and his mother against a violent attacker who entered their home
So you do support the death penalty for burglary then?Yeah, I'm sure you'd have such confidence in the courts of it was someone who smashed your front window, entered your home and attacked your family.
Fuck that guy, he got what he deserved.