★
DAON-PHOBLACHT
CHORCAÍ
Home
baile
Forums
fóraim
Tickets
ceol
Event Guide
Imeachtaí
Street Art
ealaíon sráide
Articles
ailt
Cork Slang
béarlagair
Contact
teagmháil
Shop
siopa
Articles
Cork Slang
Forums
Events
Shop
Gwan
Order search results by
Date of last reply
Date thread created
Order search results by
Current events
Archive
Home
Forums
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
The Langers Forum
Jesus lads, 'tis looking like BREXIT!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="How bad boy" data-source="post: 7425285" data-attributes="member: 3028"><p>It's even worse when you see what actually in the amendments the Lords have included.</p><p></p><p>There were only two, one where those who have supported the UK armed forces are excluded, the other where there is a mechanism for reviewing the status of Rwanda as a formally declared safe country.</p><p></p><p>Basically, Rwanda can do what they want, but without new primary legislation, the UK government would be forced, by law, to consider them a safe country. The amendment was to introduce a non-legislative way of undoing the declaration of them as a safe country.</p><p></p><p>How those are considered unreasonable is beyond me, but then again, the entire thing is beyond me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="How bad boy, post: 7425285, member: 3028"] It's even worse when you see what actually in the amendments the Lords have included. There were only two, one where those who have supported the UK armed forces are excluded, the other where there is a mechanism for reviewing the status of Rwanda as a formally declared safe country. Basically, Rwanda can do what they want, but without new primary legislation, the UK government would be forced, by law, to consider them a safe country. The amendment was to introduce a non-legislative way of undoing the declaration of them as a safe country. How those are considered unreasonable is beyond me, but then again, the entire thing is beyond me. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
The Langers Forum
Jesus lads, 'tis looking like BREXIT!
Top