tempobet tipobet Instagram Profiles
How unlucky can a family be? - Peoples Republic Of Cork Discussion Forums

Go Back   Peoples Republic Of Cork Discussion Forums > The Langers Forum
User Name
Password
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-03-2020, 08:18 AM
Meridian Meridian is offline
Senior PROC Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: A better place
Posts: 9,510
Default How unlucky can a family be?

This beauty got some justice, fair dues to The Judge;

06.03.2020 15:40

Cork man has case dismissed for 'misleading and unimpressive' footpath fall claim

Liam Heylin

A YOUNG man who “appears to have a problem walking down footpaths” brought his third claim yesterday for compensation against Cork City Council for tripping on a footpath.

The judge dismissed the claim saying there was a perfectly good footpath across the road but the plaintiff chose to walk on the faulty one.

The local authority’s barrister said during the case at Cork Circuit Court that – apart from Jesus Christ – not many people fall for the third time.

22-year-old Adam Donovan of Hollyhill Lane, Cork, testified that his mother met him after work and they went over to Centra to buy scratch cards for his grandmother and walk down to her house in Bridevalley View, Fairhill, along a footpath with which he was very familiar, on September 1 2017.

“When I was walking down, talking to my mother I was talking to my mother and the next thing I know my right leg went down and I twisted my leg. I got up and could not put pressure on my right leg,” the plaintiff said.

He got a lift home from there and took painkillers and put his right foot in a dish of iced water. He thought it would clear up but it was still sore on September 7 so he went to Mercy University Hospital and they did scans and x-rays and advised him to go to his GP if it continued to pain him. He went to his doctor on September 26.

He stopped playing soccer until after Christmas and then returned to it but added, “When I was training it was coming at me.” He gave up soccer and trained in the gym and that did not cause him ankle pain, he told his barrister, Donnacha Kiely.

Barrister for Cork City Council, James Duggan, put it to the plaintiff, “You were very familiar with the area, you knew the footpath was in a bad condition?”*

Donovan replied, “Just because it is in a bad condition, does that mean you can’t walk down it?” Mr Duggan said, “It was in bad condition, you should have been taking more care.”*

The plaintiff replied, “It is not my fault. The footpath should be fine.

“You appear to have a problem walking down footpaths. This is your third fall,” the defence barrister said.*

“It is not my fault,” the plaintiff said.*

Mr Duggan BL said, “Not many people fall three times. Our Lord, unfortunately, did. You seem to have done it three times - once when you were 12 or 13 you fell and it was on a footpath. You brought a claim for that. How much did you get?”*

Adam Donovan replied, “I am not sure.” Mr Duggan BL said, “€5,000 – does that sound right?”*

The city council barrister said there was another claim arising out of a fall on February 16 2016. The defendant said in the first incident he was walking his dog and in the 2016 fall he was jogging by Knocknaheeny Park. He could not remember how much compensation he was given for that fall either.

As well as the three claims against Cork City Council, the plaintiff confirmed he brought a claim against CIE/Bus Eireann in 2016.*

He said he consulted a solicitor about injuries he sustained when assaulted in the 3 Arena in Dublin but no claim was brought. Mr Duggan said that in the reply to particulars he did not mention the 3 Arena injuries.

Mr Duggan said three family members of the plaintiff had brought claims against Cork City Council in the past. The plaintiff replied: “What has that got to do with anything?” Judge Brian O’Callaghan said the claim was brought in relation to a twisted ankle.*

The judge said, “The plaintiff categorically knew well the footpath was faulty and made it quite clear that he was entitled to walk on this footpath, it was his right to walk on the footpath and why should he not.

“The court cannot be blind to a perfectly good footpath across the road (in photographs) if he wanted to exercise his right to traverse footpaths. He knew there is a good footpath and chose to walk on this faulty footpath.

“He made an intentional decision. The court has to state quite categorically that it is unimpressed with his evidence on other injuries. A plaintiff, when pursuing a claim has an utter responsibility to declare in a fulsome way about other claims and injuries… The court must have great concerns about his evidence.

“This court won’t go so far as to say it was false but it was misleading and unimpressive. The court proceeds to dismiss the plaintiff’s claim. The court feels practically obliged to make an order for costs (against the plaintiff) and does so.”
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-03-2020, 08:47 AM
Meridian Meridian is offline
Senior PROC Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: A better place
Posts: 9,510
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diamond Joe Quimby View Post
The judge dismissed the claim saying there was a perfectly good footpath across the road but the plaintiff chose to walk on the faulty one.

In fairness, thats some nonsense argument from the judge.
Indeed, but the last 2 sentences are my favourite bit.

The fact that costs were awarded against him just might make him and his family think about their next " accident "
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-03-2020, 09:15 AM
andtherestinjellys andtherestinjellys is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,502
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diamond Joe Quimby View Post
The judge dismissed the claim saying there was a perfectly good footpath across the road but the plaintiff chose to walk on the faulty one.

In fairness, thats some nonsense argument from the judge.
Ya don't bother fixing it the one on the other side of the road will do, that whole day in court sounds like a fucking huge waste of my money.
That should be going towards that footpath
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-03-2020, 09:24 AM
jimmym jimmym is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 24,103
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Meridian View Post
Indeed, but the last 2 sentences are my favourite bit.

The fact that costs were awarded against him just might make him and his family think about their next " accident "
But but but whatabout the bankers and developers who robbed the country?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-03-2020, 11:58 AM
HappyAl HappyAl is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,775
Default

Fraud.

Deception.

Mattie? Could/should it happen?
__________________
- Oh, yes. Oh, very yes. I would very much like to invade the Transvaal. Look at my tooth; it's shining with lust.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-03-2020, 08:25 AM
Beaty Beaty is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: In Utero
Posts: 13,435
Default

This guy be trippin'!

B
__________________
To be married, is to be divorced from one's self.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-03-2020, 10:29 AM
CJ Poogan CJ Poogan is offline
Senior PROC Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 3,733
Default

Locals are calling him jesus because he has fallen 3 times.

An absolute scumbag family with zero concept of right from wrong yet in their twisted mind view see this kind of shit as a victimless crime.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-03-2020, 10:35 AM
nelly sham nelly sham is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 12,451
Default

I cracked my ankle tripping over one of those horseshoe shaped grates when I was a kid, to think I’d have a bit of cash in the back pocket now if I’d amped it up.

I couldn’t be dealing with people calling me Jesus though.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-03-2020, 10:43 AM
jimmym jimmym is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 24,103
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CJ Poogan View Post
Locals are calling him jesus because he has fallen 3 times.

An absolute scumbag family with zero concept of right from wrong yet in their twisted mind view see this kind of shit as a victimless crime.
Well said
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-03-2020, 12:09 PM
HappyAl HappyAl is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,775
Default

Anyone an iota of what the costs would be?

Will it be deducted from his weekly welfare?

Also, what will happen if he doesnt pay?
__________________
- Oh, yes. Oh, very yes. I would very much like to invade the Transvaal. Look at my tooth; it's shining with lust.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump










All times are GMT. The time now is 08:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All forum comments are the sole responsibility and property of forum users. PeoplesRepublicOfCork.com and its sponsors disclaim all liability for content posted by users of the forum. PeoplesRepublicOfCork.com and its sponsors do not necessarily share the views expressed in this forum. Use the report post system to have comments considered for edit or deletion. All users are IP logged. Website hosted by Hostrocket USA.