• A reminder that if you give a thumbs up or similarly positive reaction to a racist comment you may also receive a ban along with the user that wrote the post.

What has happened The Examiner?

Not a bad article but suffers from the aesthetic glitz and meandering notional thought in its writing it complains about in kitchens.


There's definitely something to be said about aesthetics and keeping up with the Jones's. I was talking to a kitchen fitter a few years ago. He was saying there were groups of older bored people living on a particular street he would be fitting a new kitchen for every four years. There was nothing wrong with their old kitchen, it looked good, was a modern design, it worked perfectly for all the needs you'd have in a kitchen, they just wanted the experience of getting a new kitchen and having something new.

He was saying the entire kitchen business he worked for, literally everyone working for them, had "new" second hand kitchens in their homes because people just said, "Get rid of it!" about the old stuff. Miele white goods, top quality solid stone surfaces, solid wood cabinets, drawers and presses, everyone working there taking time to fit their co-workers and their wider family's kitchens whenever something suitable came up.

On the other hand I also know people who've got a new kitchen after living in a makeshift one for twenty-five years and getting pissed off with cludges and hacks, and piecemeal upgrades holding it together. New white goods too despite the old stuff being functional. In one case they rang the SVP who were thrilled someone thought of them. Fridge, dishwasher, washing machine, second hand but all in decent nick because they were looked after, all picked up within a day, bang on time, taken out and taken away by the SVP guy with a van, then passed onto someone who couldn't afford such stuff in their home. It'd really hammer home the difference between some people's attitudes.
 
Good, short article this, despite the morkoshing/PR bollocks in the interview. About how apprenticeships need to be rolled out beyond the traditional areas with trades.


Constructivism in education is nothing new, and is considered by many to be superior to the purely academic route. It's basically what trades/apprenticeships already try to do, and it's about the balance you take on. The idea is you have a mixture of book learning and then applying your book learning in practical arenas soon after, tying them both together and bringing on incremental learning with incremental experience. The trades already send electricians and the like to colleges to learn the ins and outs of physics, electronics and electricity, while the universities try (badly) to get their students to apply their learning in a practical manner via group projects and work experience. I say badly because there's no supervision of any of the group projects, etc. So there's no "boss" or PM like in the real world.

It desperately needs to be looked at post-leaving cert. For all the jokes about learning in "the school of hard knocks" there's a huge value in reading and hearing about something then seeing how it actually plays out in reality.

It's something that would have benefited me a great deal, and I'm sure there's many others who'd have liked the mix of academic and practical instead of one or the other. Not to mind, as the PR guy says, actually earning the bobs for beer and curries while you do that.
 

Shocking indifference to catastrophic Blackwater pollution is a sign of the times​

The Blackwater fish kill is part ecological disaster, part culture war, part climate change confrontation and, worst of all, a gross denial of responsibility.

IT is almost a month since something around 50,000 fish – primarily trout and the vanishing remnants of a decimated salmon population – were killed in the River Blackwater. The catastrophe has the unenviable status of being the worst fish kill in the history of this Republic. To date, it has not been possible, despite the efforts of four State agencies and a visit by Minister Timmy Dooley supported by the usual platoon of hangers on, to identify the origin of the deadly toxin. Any meaningful legal response becomes more unlikely with every day that passes.

Once again, the perpetrators of an environmental/social catastrophe may avoid consequences. We are dangerously close to that dead-end cliché: There are lessons to be learned. Will they ever be learned?

The immediate response was entirely predictable and justified. Anglers and conservationists were outraged and couldn’t imagine penalties severe enough for those responsible. Suspicions around who might be culpable quickly became beliefs, a process fuelled by the shameful record of North Cork Co-operative Creameries. This milk processor has been convicted of myriad breaches of legislation and the terms of its Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) licences. That the adjacent River Allow, a Special Area of Conservation, had in June 2024 been decimated by a chemical spill at an Uisce Eireann plant at Freemount added to a tinderbox atmosphere.

As late as February, 2024 North Cork Co-op pleaded guilty to eight charges of breaching the conditions of its emissions licence. Water samples taken by the EPA at its facility after the fish kill found that ammonia levels 52 times the legal limit, and orthophosphate levels two-and-a-half times above the limit, were dumped into the River Allow during a ten-hour period on the night of the fish kill. The EPA has made eight site visits to the creamery since June 24. Since then, the EPA has issued 22 non-compliance notices to the Co-op including 13 related to breaches of emissions limit values. How many breaches before the plant is closed? 122?

Despite that litany, the EPA this week exonerated the milk processor saying it does not believe the creamery could have caused the fish kill.

The agency said it had expanded its investigation following the findings of a Marine Institute study indicating that a waterborne “irritant” was likely to have caused or contributed to the carnage and that exposure may have occurred in the days before August 12. The expanded investigation includes discharges from EPA-regulated sites that may have occurred over a wider date range in the catchment.

Those sorry realities are some of the incomplete and uncertain nuts and bolts of the tragedy but maybe it’s time to broaden the context so those infamous lessons might be learned.

Local conservationist and angler Conor Arnold, chairman of Killavullen Anglers who has been at the forefront of the reactions to the kill, hit the nail on the head when he said:

It took too long to get test results. All procedures took too long.

"There was no health warning. The seriousness of the situation - we cannot allow it to be replicated anywhere else.

“We are appalled and outraged … the lack of urgency and protocols implemented by the IFI and the EPA are unacceptable. The test results published last Friday are incomplete and raise more questions than answers. We have asked for accountability, but that does not seem to be forthcoming. Whatever the investigation establishes, the catastrophe highlights a systemic failure by the state bodies to protect our waterways.”

That response highlights again our enthusiasm for enacting laws but not enforcing them. It also highlights the urgent need for a single powerful agency to take responsibility for the waterways. The current system means that at least four State agencies are chasing the same ghost under disparate, and sometimes conflicting legislative schemes.

The Fisheries Consolidation Act 1959 and the Local Government (Water Pollution) Act 1977 are the primary legislative instruments under which polluters are prosecuted. The ’59 act has been recognised as not fit for purpose for years, but a replacement is long awaited. Who benefits from that inconclusive melee?

One of the things that could easily be done would be what’s done in Iceland - placing permanent pollution monitors in all vulnerable rivers. These relatively cheap alarms provoke phone alerts once an unexpected event is detected.

This would be a plausible response even if it is all too easy to imagine who might oppose it. It would also obviate unfounded assessments which early in this saga erroneously pointed to the possibility of a fungal infection causing the calamity.

Salmon Watch Ireland have pointed out that “agriculture remains the dominant long-term pressure on the catchment, the scale and suddenness of this tragedy may suggest that an acute pollution event possibly linked to wastewater, industry, or an accidental discharge may have tipped an already fragile river system into collapse.

"The Blackwater, designated under the EU Habitats Directive for salmon, lamprey, and freshwater pearl mussel, is not only an ecological jewel but also a cultural and economic lifeline for the region. This kill has underlined just how vulnerable the river has become.”

Salmon Watch refers to research presented at the Teagasc Dairy Conference 2024 which shows that our water quality is under strain. Just over half of our rivers meet Good Status. In the Blackwater catchment, 66% of waters are High/Good, but nitrate levels remain persistently high (average ~3 mg/l N at Lismore Bridge) — above the 1.8 mg/l N threshold for good health.

The general indifference to this catastrophe is deeply shocking as if it had nothing to do with everyday life for those who depend on the Blackwater and other water systems for drinking water and so much more.

Agriculture is the dominant contributor (more than 80%) of nitrogen loads, but cumulative pressures from wastewater, urban run-off, and potential industrial releases make the system highly vulnerable. Teagasc also recorded that over 20% of farms exceed 170 kg N/ha organic loading, with some sub-catchments exceeding 30–40%.

In light of those figures the Government’s support for the extension of the EU nitrates derogation – the very last one in Europe – is impossible to defend. That so many of this island’s lakes – especially Lough Neagh - are fighting the invasion of algae because of nitrates puts that issue well beyond any debate.

So too is our struggling network of water treatment plants. Uisce Eireann figures dealing with Cork treatment plants paint a grim picture.

Among 150 facilities, 28 of them have a Red Status which means that no spare capacity is available so new developments cannot be considered. The agency gives an Amber Status to around 25 sites, signifying limited capacity. The rest, just under 100, have spare capacity, though anyone familiar with the state of the Blackwater downstream of Mallow might find that assessment generous. I’ve fished the river for over four decades but have not been there since last year when what I believed were human turds bounced around my legs as I waded the river.

Indifference

Our planning system, where objections to water plants are routine, is part of the problem as is the phenomenal cost of these facilities. However, the elephant in the room is our disastrous rejection of water charges. A significant majority recognised the need to pay for water to sustain a viable system.

But maybe the biggest change needed is cultural rather than structural. The general indifference to this catastrophe is deeply shocking as if it had nothing to do with everyday life for those who depend on the Blackwater and other water systems for drinking water and so much more.

 
Not a bad article but suffers from the aesthetic glitz and meandering notional thought in its writing it complains about in kitchens.


There's definitely something to be said about aesthetics and keeping up with the Jones's. I was talking to a kitchen fitter a few years ago. He was saying there were groups of older bored people living on a particular street he would be fitting a new kitchen for every four years. There was nothing wrong with their old kitchen, it looked good, was a modern design, it worked perfectly for all the needs you'd have in a kitchen, they just wanted the experience of getting a new kitchen and having something new.

He was saying the entire kitchen business he worked for, literally everyone working for them, had "new" second hand kitchens in their homes because people just said, "Get rid of it!" about the old stuff. Miele white goods, top quality solid stone surfaces, solid wood cabinets, drawers and presses, everyone working there taking time to fit their co-workers and their wider family's kitchens whenever something suitable came up.

On the other hand I also know people who've got a new kitchen after living in a makeshift one for twenty-five years and getting pissed off with cludges and hacks, and piecemeal upgrades holding it together. New white goods too despite the old stuff being functional. In one case they rang the SVP who were thrilled someone thought of them. Fridge, dishwasher, washing machine, second hand but all in decent nick because they were looked after, all picked up within a day, bang on time, taken out and taken away by the SVP guy with a van, then passed onto someone who couldn't afford such stuff in their home. It'd really hammer home the difference between some people's attitudes.
I'm sure there are middle class people like that but how substantial a number are they? You'd see people having brand new SUVs and such like but those are on public show. People don't visit each others' houses anything like they used to so the new kitchen must be, as you say, out of boredom or having too much money. I'm delighted I don't know anyone of either vacuous type.

BTW, you should look up Giroud's theory of mimetic desire, very much the hot philosophical school of thought in US political circles these days.
 
BTW, you should look up Giroud's theory of mimetic desire, very much the hot philosophical school of thought in US political circles these days.
Not too interested in philosophy any more. I've solved that. for now (limmy). More interested in sociology. Goffman's writing on stigma is vastly underrated in broader circles although those in the know know it's foundational to a lot of modern thought.
 
What's On Today

Live Music

Ballads & Banjos

The Welcome Inn, What's On Today @ 9:30 pm

More events ▼
Top