• A reminder that if you give a thumbs up or similarly positive reaction to a racist comment you may also receive a ban along with the user that wrote the post.

Trump is back baby!

Who will win the debate

  • Trump

    Votes: 17 33.3%
  • Harris

    Votes: 22 43.1%
  • I genuinely don’t care at this stage

    Votes: 12 23.5%

  • Total voters
    51
  • Poll closed .
"official Trump meme Coin Drops 1.4% as $635M Royalty Disclosure Reveals $700M Buyer Losses: Official Trump declined 1.4% following reports of $635 million in royalties to Donald Trump from the token, contrasted by a Reuters finding that buyers collectively lost over $700 million as the token price fell approximately 97% from its peak."

Trump is fleecing his sucker followers, He made $635 million in royalties from his Coin while the buyers lose $700. The Coin is only worth $1.71 today but that is irrelevant to Trump as he makes his money from volume of dealing. Because of his position of power he can influence the volatility of the coin which in turn increases the volume of dealing. A lot of gullible stupid people around.
 
This is a hugely important decision that got very little attention when it happened:

"On Monday, the US supreme court handed him – and all future presidents – the power to fire leaders of independent agencies or commissions, overturning 90 years of court precedent curbing executive power."

This captures why this could be an absolutely huge deal:

"Personal data transfers between the EU and the US are made possible by the EU-US Data Privacy Framework (EU-US DPF), under which the US committed to protect personal data transferred to the US from its mass surveillance programmes. Data flows between the UK and the US depend on this scheme as well. The oversight of the framework rested on a number of US federal agencies, whose independence has now been gutted by the Supreme Court ruling.
...
US federal agencies have become structurally unable to act as meaningful legal guardians, making any future agreement with the US unworkable. Short-term fixes that were relied on in previous crises, such as Standard Contractual Clauses, would now prove ineffective: contracts are no solution against arbitrary State power, and there is no realistic prospect of a structural agreement being reached.

Likewise, the UK has recently reformed its data protection law to, potentially, allow personal data transfers to take place even if such protections are missing. If the UK were to pursue this path, however, it would lose adequacy status with the EU, and the consequences would be dramatic.
...
Tech companies who are based or operate in the US are now exposed to a new reality, where their legal obligations can be manipulated arbitrarily by the US administration.
...
In 2022, the Biden administration signed an Executive Order that established a mechanism to protect personal data transfers to the US, and restrictions to the President’s authority to conduct surveillance programmes. This was the culmination of a long political process, started with the Data Free Flow with Trust initiative and the OECD declaration on government access to data, which sought to create baseline rule of law safeguards for the secure transfer of personal data among democratic countries.

On the basis of these commitments, the European Commission adopted the an adequacy decision for the so-called EU-US Data Privacy Framework (EU-US DPF), which legalises transfers of personal data between the EU and the US. However, the oversight of this framework rested on the FTC, the PCLOB, and the Data Protection Review Court. Article 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU requires oversight to be independent, to protect the overseers’ ability to enforce legal standards. By empowering the Trump administration to remove their members at will, the US Supreme Court undermined oversight, and thus the workability of the framework as a whole."



The TL:DR is that the Trump administration can do what they want now with the FTC. It was politically independent, which kept the EU happy-ish that if the US government or organisations tried to carry out surveillance or abuse of personal data, tthe FTC might stop that happening.

The EU has been deeply unhappy about that fiction, but it has held to date.

This supreme court ruling means it is now gone and with it the pretence that European data has any protection guarantees when it comes to US organisations.
Which is fun.


There's a rake of things this administration is doing that mean the long term willingness of EU organisations to work with US IT and software companies is in serious trouble, ranging from the actions against the ICC, Microsoft's statements in the French senate hearings, the imposition of export controls on Anthropic's latest model and now this ruling.
If you're a non-US government looking to build AI systems, you'd want to have a screw loose to sign up to build production systems with US AI
 
This is a hugely important decision that got very little attention when it happened:

"On Monday, the US supreme court handed him – and all future presidents – the power to fire leaders of independent agencies or commissions, overturning 90 years of court precedent curbing executive power."

This captures why this could be an absolutely huge deal:

"Personal data transfers between the EU and the US are made possible by the EU-US Data Privacy Framework (EU-US DPF), under which the US committed to protect personal data transferred to the US from its mass surveillance programmes. Data flows between the UK and the US depend on this scheme as well. The oversight of the framework rested on a number of US federal agencies, whose independence has now been gutted by the Supreme Court ruling.
...
US federal agencies have become structurally unable to act as meaningful legal guardians, making any future agreement with the US unworkable. Short-term fixes that were relied on in previous crises, such as Standard Contractual Clauses, would now prove ineffective: contracts are no solution against arbitrary State power, and there is no realistic prospect of a structural agreement being reached.

Likewise, the UK has recently reformed its data protection law to, potentially, allow personal data transfers to take place even if such protections are missing. If the UK were to pursue this path, however, it would lose adequacy status with the EU, and the consequences would be dramatic.
...
Tech companies who are based or operate in the US are now exposed to a new reality, where their legal obligations can be manipulated arbitrarily by the US administration.
...
In 2022, the Biden administration signed an Executive Order that established a mechanism to protect personal data transfers to the US, and restrictions to the President’s authority to conduct surveillance programmes. This was the culmination of a long political process, started with the Data Free Flow with Trust initiative and the OECD declaration on government access to data, which sought to create baseline rule of law safeguards for the secure transfer of personal data among democratic countries.

On the basis of these commitments, the European Commission adopted the an adequacy decision for the so-called EU-US Data Privacy Framework (EU-US DPF), which legalises transfers of personal data between the EU and the US. However, the oversight of this framework rested on the FTC, the PCLOB, and the Data Protection Review Court. Article 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU requires oversight to be independent, to protect the overseers’ ability to enforce legal standards. By empowering the Trump administration to remove their members at will, the US Supreme Court undermined oversight, and thus the workability of the framework as a whole."



The TL:DR is that the Trump administration can do what they want now with the FTC. It was politically independent, which kept the EU happy-ish that if the US government or organisations tried to carry out surveillance or abuse of personal data, tthe FTC might stop that happening.

The EU has been deeply unhappy about that fiction, but it has held to date.

This supreme court ruling means it is now gone and with it the pretence that European data has any protection guarantees when it comes to US organisations.
Which is fun.


There's a rake of things this administration is doing that mean the long term willingness of EU organisations to work with US IT and software companies is in serious trouble, ranging from the actions against the ICC, Microsoft's statements in the French senate hearings, the imposition of export controls on Anthropic's latest model and now this ruling.
If you're a non-US government looking to build AI systems, you'd want to have a screw loose to sign up to build production systems with US AI



"very little attention".....How dare you LOL

 
My apologies, there's regularly bad news from the US supreme court these days...
Will say, the call out on data adequacy isn't there, but could be hugely impactful on Ireland, due to the sheer number of US tech companies. Hard to be certain whether it'd be positive or negative though.
 
Another war sorted:

Balogun is only eligible to play for US because he was born in the US actually he was accidently born there while is mother was on holiday there from the UK. Under Trumps birthright proposal he would not be entitled to be a US citizen
 
What's On Today

Live Music

Ceilí Cois Locha

The Lough, What's On Today @ 7:30 pm

More events ▼
Top