• A reminder that if you give a thumbs up or similarly positive reaction to a racist comment you may also receive a ban along with the user that wrote the post.

The Official Man Utd Thread - Part 3.

I wouldn't be too worried about that. Hard to see Amorin last the season (won't be entirely his fault).

Worrying about players and their style is irrelevant if you don't have a DOF ensuring a footballing philosophy across time and personnel.

No consistency leads to high turnover which leads to no consistency, etc etc
People are so obsessed with this God damn system. Amorim does stick with this system, but it doesn't mean he shows no versatility within the framework.

It can be a very defensive system or a very attacking one, or in between simply by the players you pick. I'm also sure Amorim can get players to do certain jobs within the framework that might not be visible to all us Tommy tactics out here (unless you're fed up. SSB football genius)

I agree with your point in the main though. And INEOS are making decent reputable football appointments behind the scenes. It's going to take time to see the benefits.

Whether Amorin will be around to see those benefits is doubtful as you say.
 
I agree with your point in the main though. And INEOS are making decent reputable football appointments behind the scenes. It's going to take time to see the benefits.

I don’t see a whole pile of evidence of that tbh.

Their main saving grace is that they are not the Glazers.

They were the ones who extended Ten Hags contract. Or appointed the people behind the scenes that did.

The signings under Ineos have been bang average. £211m spent on:

De Ligt £42m
Yoro £55m
Mazraoui £12m
Ugarte £42m
Dorgu £25m
Zirkzee £35m

The Dan Ashworth fiasco reflects poorly on them as well not to mention the PR of the scrooge-like cutbacks behind the scenes.

Capital spending on infrastructure projects is exempt from PSR.

Asking the British government to subsidise the new stadium when Big Jim could fund it himself is another bad look.
 
I don’t see a whole pile of evidence of that tbh.

Their main saving grace is that they are not the Glazers.

They were the ones who extended Ten Hags contract. Or appointed the people behind the scenes that did.

The signings under Ineos have been bang average. £211m spent on:

De Ligt £42m
Yoro £55m
Mazraoui £12m
Ugarte £42m
Dorgu £25m
Zirkzee £35m

The Dan Ashworth fiasco reflects poorly on them as well not to mention the PR of the scrooge-like cutbacks behind the scenes.

Capital spending on infrastructure projects is exempt from PSR.

Asking the British government to subsidise the new stadium when Big Jim could fund it himself is another bad look.
You tell him orchardY m8!
 
I don’t see a whole pile of evidence of that tbh.

Their main saving grace is that they are not the Glazers.

They were the ones who extended Ten Hags contract. Or appointed the people behind the scenes that did.

The signings under Ineos have been bang average. £211m spent on:

De Ligt £42m
Yoro £55m
Mazraoui £12m
Ugarte £42m
Dorgu £25m
Zirkzee £35m

The Dan Ashworth fiasco reflects poorly on them as well not to mention the PR of the scrooge-like cutbacks behind the scenes.

Capital spending on infrastructure projects is exempt from PSR.

Asking the British government to subsidise the new stadium when Big Jim could fund it himself is another bad look.
@Nollaig O Muracu I wouldn't take that biy
 
Last edited:
I don’t see a whole pile of evidence of that tbh.

Their main saving grace is that they are not the Glazers.

They were the ones who extended Ten Hags contract. Or appointed the people behind the scenes that did.

The signings under Ineos have been bang average. £211m spent on:

De Ligt £42m
Yoro £55m
Mazraoui £12m
Ugarte £42m
Dorgu £25m
Zirkzee £35m

The Dan Ashworth fiasco reflects poorly on them as well not to mention the PR of the scrooge-like cutbacks behind the scenes.

Capital spending on infrastructure projects is exempt from PSR.

Asking the British government to subsidise the new stadium when Big Jim could fund it himself is another bad look.

The PROCs top top MUFC supporter.


He's no real interest in Liverpool when it comes down to it.
 
I don’t see a whole pile of evidence of that tbh.

Their main saving grace is that they are not the Glazers.

They were the ones who extended Ten Hags contract. Or appointed the people behind the scenes that did.

The signings under Ineos have been bang average. £211m spent on:

De Ligt £42m
Yoro £55m
Mazraoui £12m
Ugarte £42m
Dorgu £25m
Zirkzee £35m

The Dan Ashworth fiasco reflects poorly on them as well not to mention the PR of the scrooge-like cutbacks behind the scenes.

Capital spending on infrastructure projects is exempt from PSR.

Asking the British government to subsidise the new stadium when Big Jim could fund it himself is another bad look.
I'm taking about people being put in place to fix recruitment. Like this guy


There's a few more like him. I'm not estactic with INEOS either but they are trying to fix the recruitment at least.

Their engagements with the fans have been disastrous, but also, they're trying to fix 20 years of Glazer bullshit. Whether they succeed is another matter, but they are making changes at the club.

There's also an overdue upgrade to training facilities on the way. The Glazers never fixed any of that and never made any decent appointments and just basically gave the keys to Woodward and Arnold.

Ineos are not great, but they're not as bad as those cunts either.
 
What's On Today

Live Music

Joe Mac

Cantys, What's On Today @ 6:00 pm

More events ▼
Top