Not so much tbh. I'd be gutted if I didn't back him at all...but to keep on the right side of variance you need to draw the line somewhere.
In very few cases will a 490.0 shot end up in genuine contention come Sunday. Not to mind win it. Even after that great first round Bridgeman is still only a 15/1-20/1 shot (DataGolf vs Betfair).
The way I look at it - with Bridgeman, the odds made him the 92nd best player in the field and my model made him the 19th best. It would be a hell of an achievement for him if he out-performed the weight of money and finished in or around that 20th spot. I'd rather be cheering on one of those landing every 2 or 3 tournaments than go a whole year (or more) potentially watching those long odds win-only bets go down the tubes.
Also, if I'm honest...iI I had backed Bridgeman at 490.0 I'd be severely tempted to jusy walk away and take the profit after round #1.
That said...before tee-off I did have a small stakes win-only bet on Ben Silverman who was also a big price (180.0) - as he was more in the sweet spot of chunky price and high rating (only 3 players had a materially higher rating than him in my model).