Seems pretty clear you haven't a clue about Scottish football apart from the occasional scoreline.
You tried to claim that the awarding of a penalty to Aberdeen against The Rangers somehow meant even-handedness in refereeing in Scotland because you could point to that penalty - despite the fact that Aberdeen were denied another stonewaller in the same game, which should also have resulted in The Rangers having had their keeper sent off. Even the Aberdeen manager went to the media after the game saying it. But your only counter was, wait for it, the Aberdeen manager isn't a poster on PROC. You're beyond parody when you have to resort to such abject silliness Earl.
Do you know that subsequent to that match, with the The Rangers first domestic red card since 2019, that they went again and complained the referee. Yes, they lodged an official complaint on SEVEN different aspects of the ref's handling of that game. And surprise surprise, well not to anyone who has a passing knowledge of the working of the game in Scotland, said ref was subsequently suspended from top flight officiating. Just as the previous ref they complained about was.
So, Celtic recieved the benefit of doubt in a marginal off-side decision and it was still in the newspapers a week afterwards. The ex Head of Referees came out saying it was a disgrace that it happened.
Fast forward to when the huns recieve not just the benefit of not having a penalty given against them, they complained the ref had awarded another penalty and sent a player off, and the Ref gets suspended.
It would be hilariously funny if it wasn't such a serious issue with so much riding on such events.
But meanwhile, in a treehouse somewhere in Cork, some guy who occasionally watches SPL matches, thinks there's absolutely nothing to see in any of this because.....well, ...just because.
www.scotsman.com
