Your comment alone proves my point .here you are commenting on limerick hurling online in relation to something that happened outside the field of sport.Yet youve no problem with the limerick hurlers continuing to select an actual convicted violent criminal. standards make yours a double
My point to reiterate it again was i thought it was an ill advised appointment and would lead to controversy online etc that munster could do without thats all , Randall is innocent in the eyes of the law as the alleged victim didnt proceed with it.
Last edited:

