★
DAON-PHOBLACHT
CHORCAÍ
Home
baile
Forums
fóraim
Tickets
ceol
Event Guide
Imeachtaí
Street Art
ealaíon sráide
Articles
ailt
Cork Slang
béarlagair
Contact
teagmháil
Shop
siopa
Articles
Cork Slang
Forums
Events
Shop
Lamp
Order search results by
Date of last reply
Date thread created
Order search results by
Current events
Archive
Home
Forums
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
The Langers Forum
Stuff that grinds your gears
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Drucker" data-source="post: 7081515" data-attributes="member: 40902"><p>This is where things get interesting for the guys who festoon gopros or garmins all over their vehicles and then go out generating content by deliberately inciting road rage incidents.</p><p></p><p>Now that the UK is no longer (happily) part of the EU, GDPR doesn't apply to them, which is probably why the person recording footage of an errant motorist and titling the result with the identifiable number plate of the vehicle, it could be said that the number plate made the individual identifiable and therefore fell foul of the GDPR.</p><p></p><p>Also, the "d" in "GDPR," stands for "Data" and now that photography is overwhelmingly digital, many people would claim that their image is their property and capturing it, storing it, analysing it, or broadcasting it without their consent is in breach of their rights to privacy.</p><p></p><p>Capturing an image in a public place is not illegal. The garmin/gopro/dashcam roadrage content generator brigade are however clearly in breach of multiple pieces of legislation. </p><p></p><p>Ironically, this tends to place the road rage brigade in the laughable position that they break one law while trying to highlight what they perceive to be someone else breaking another law. If you are using dashcam or gopro footage or CCTV footage for your own personal use than you would normally fall under the "household</p><p>exemption. clause. </p><p>More here:</p><p>"Those using a dash cam in a public area should be aware that the publication of footage, for example on social media platforms, could represent a further act of processing and could risk infringing the data protection rights of recorded individuals. In general, and in line with the CJEU’s reasoning in the Buivids case (C–345/17), publication of material to an indefinite audience, such as on a fully public social media channel, cannot be considered to fall within the personal or household exemption."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Drucker, post: 7081515, member: 40902"] This is where things get interesting for the guys who festoon gopros or garmins all over their vehicles and then go out generating content by deliberately inciting road rage incidents. Now that the UK is no longer (happily) part of the EU, GDPR doesn't apply to them, which is probably why the person recording footage of an errant motorist and titling the result with the identifiable number plate of the vehicle, it could be said that the number plate made the individual identifiable and therefore fell foul of the GDPR. Also, the "d" in "GDPR," stands for "Data" and now that photography is overwhelmingly digital, many people would claim that their image is their property and capturing it, storing it, analysing it, or broadcasting it without their consent is in breach of their rights to privacy. Capturing an image in a public place is not illegal. The garmin/gopro/dashcam roadrage content generator brigade are however clearly in breach of multiple pieces of legislation. Ironically, this tends to place the road rage brigade in the laughable position that they break one law while trying to highlight what they perceive to be someone else breaking another law. If you are using dashcam or gopro footage or CCTV footage for your own personal use than you would normally fall under the "household exemption. clause. More here: "Those using a dash cam in a public area should be aware that the publication of footage, for example on social media platforms, could represent a further act of processing and could risk infringing the data protection rights of recorded individuals. In general, and in line with the CJEU’s reasoning in the Buivids case (C–345/17), publication of material to an indefinite audience, such as on a fully public social media channel, cannot be considered to fall within the personal or household exemption." [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
The Langers Forum
Stuff that grinds your gears
Top