Sinn Fein are not a Normal Political Party


Cullinane will be the sacrifical lamb 😂
Cullinane tweeted support for Garron Noone recently following Noones tweet re immigration, It was seen as a strange move,
It is possible Cullinane is been sent out to tweet on certain issues to test public opinion,
 
Cullinane tweeted support for Garron Noone recently following Noones tweet re immigration, It was seen as a strange move,
It is possible Cullinane is been sent out to tweet on certain issues to test public opinion,

They'll say anything that they think will get them a few likes, and then row back on it straight away when they realise they've completely misread the room.

It just shows that they've no concrete policies. They'll try and see which way the wind is blowing and then go with it, but they always make a bollox of it
 
They'll say anything that they think will get them a few likes, and then row back on it straight away when they realise they've completely misread the room.

It just shows that they've no concrete policies. They'll try and see which way the wind is blowing and then go with it, but they always make a bollox of it
Nail on the head. The FlipFloppers. The only policy they have is aimed at misty eyed barstoolers and have zero idea of the cost. Pathetic party supported by imbeciles.
 
Last edited:
They'll say anything that they think will get them a few likes, and then row back on it straight away when they realise they've completely misread the room.

It just shows that they've no concrete policies. They'll try and see which way the wind is blowing and then go with it, but they always make a bollox of it

That's every party bar Peopleb4Profit, who are against everything.
 
It looks like Scum Fein / PIRA are on a lonesome and pointless journey :

The recurring speculation about Irish unity, fuelled at regular intervals by former taoiseach Leo Varadkar, is not only pointless but actually counterproductive. It is worth remembering that the anti-partition rhetoric of leading Irish politicians in every decade since independence simply contributed to making the Border more permanent and did nothing to improve the lives of people, North or South.

Fortunately, the direction of Government policy, as set out by Micheál Martin in his Shared Island initiative, eschews the old rhetoric and instead focuses on practical co-operation to deal with the problems faced by both parts of the island. It may not sound as catchy as a united Ireland but it is actually a far-sighted approach that focuses on the reality of peoples’ lives.

Martin was one of the contributors to the current special edition of the journal Studies to mark the centenary of the Boundary Commission. That body disappointed nationalist Ireland a century ago by failing to recommend significant changes in the Border and instead led to it becoming a permanent feature of Irish life.

[ Geography and destiny – Ronan McGreevy on the Boundary CommissionOpens in new window ]

Martin begins his essay by recalling a visit he made to Seamus Mallon at his home in Markethill in 2019, not long before the former deputy first minister died. After a discussion about the broad sweep of history, and some of the appalling events of the Troubles in his own area, Mallon remarked: “When are we going to realise we have to learn to share this place?”

That conversation was the inspiration for Martin’s Shared Island initiative, which forms the bedrock of the Coalition’s approach to Ireland’s future. Tánaiste Simon Harris has been as emphatic as the Taoiseach in rejecting calls for a Border poll in the next decade and instead emphasising the need to focus on practical solutions to current problems.

There are a number of fascinating essays in Studies ranging from the history of the Boundary Commission itself to explorations of how the island might evolve in the coming decades. An important theme is the challenge what a move towards a united Ireland would require of voters in the Republic.

That challenge is not just the potentially massive financial cost but the abandonment of cherished cultural symbols such as the Irish flag and anthem and indeed the Constitution itself, not to mention the daunting challenge of integrating the public service and welfare systems in the two parts of the island.

[ Flags and symbols will remain a point of division between North and SouthOpens in new window ]

An equally challenging view from the northern side of the Border was presented at a seminar in the Royal Irish Academy last week by Prof Pete Shirlow, head of the Irish studies department at the University of Liverpool. His talk was part of the ARINS project examining the future of the island.

Shirlow presented a variety of research that showed that support for a united Ireland is not growing in the North, despite the demographic changes that have seen Sinn Féin become the biggest party, with Michelle O’Neill as First Minister. Surveys show that younger people are less attached to nationalism and unionism, with growing numbers content to express a Northern Irish identity. They also show that the North is becoming more inclusive and less sectarian as time goes on.

Rory McIlroy, one of the generation keen to describe himself as Northern Irish rather than Irish or British, achieved his destiny when he won the US Masters last weekend. Being Northern Irish did not stop McIlroy playing for Ireland in the last Olympics, just as Ulster rugby players have always played for Ireland.

[ Philip Reid: I’ve been to all of Rory McIlroy’s Major triumphs. This Masters win is unmatched in historyOpens in new window ]

It is a long time since John Hume remarked that the kind of unity he sought was not unity of territory but unity of people. The Ireland that has gradually emerged since the Belfast Agreement, and continues to evolve, is surely on the road to the kind of unity he was talking about.

People living on this island can move across the Border without hindrance, can live on one side and work on the other, avail of the health services on either side that best meet their needs. The North is also in the unique position of being part of the European single market as well as the UK market.

Of course everything in the garden is not rosy. The political structures established by the Belfast Agreement have had a stop-start existence for the past three decades and the legacy of the Troubles is still an open wound. Still, both parts of the island are thriving, with the combined population set to surpass the pre-Famine peak for the first time in the coming years.

With so many international challenges facing the governments of Ireland and the UK, from Trump’s tariffs to the need to ramp up defence spending in the face of Russian aggression, talk of Irish unity is a diversion from the real challenges facing us.

Those who dream of a united Ireland involving the Tricolour flying over Stormont are as stuck in the past as people in the UK who voted to leave the EU to recreate a vanished Empire. In so many of the ways that matter to people, we have a united Ireland now. Let’s build on that.


SF/ PIRA = Scum
 
Here's another one he was made delete, why would you bother being in a party that censor honesty and truth. SF hierarchy with their cancel culture would fit in quite well with liberal, woke snowflakes that post here.
No surprise it was an Irish Times review.

Govi-CcXwAAN9f6
 
Last edited:
It looks like Scum Fein / PIRA are on a lonesome and pointless journey :

The recurring speculation about Irish unity, fuelled at regular intervals by former taoiseach Leo Varadkar, is not only pointless but actually counterproductive. It is worth remembering that the anti-partition rhetoric of leading Irish politicians in every decade since independence simply contributed to making the Border more permanent and did nothing to improve the lives of people, North or South.

Fortunately, the direction of Government policy, as set out by Micheál Martin in his Shared Island initiative, eschews the old rhetoric and instead focuses on practical co-operation to deal with the problems faced by both parts of the island. It may not sound as catchy as a united Ireland but it is actually a far-sighted approach that focuses on the reality of peoples’ lives.

Martin was one of the contributors to the current special edition of the journal Studies to mark the centenary of the Boundary Commission. That body disappointed nationalist Ireland a century ago by failing to recommend significant changes in the Border and instead led to it becoming a permanent feature of Irish life.

[ Geography and destiny – Ronan McGreevy on the Boundary CommissionOpens in new window ]

Martin begins his essay by recalling a visit he made to Seamus Mallon at his home in Markethill in 2019, not long before the former deputy first minister died. After a discussion about the broad sweep of history, and some of the appalling events of the Troubles in his own area, Mallon remarked: “When are we going to realise we have to learn to share this place?”

That conversation was the inspiration for Martin’s Shared Island initiative, which forms the bedrock of the Coalition’s approach to Ireland’s future. Tánaiste Simon Harris has been as emphatic as the Taoiseach in rejecting calls for a Border poll in the next decade and instead emphasising the need to focus on practical solutions to current problems.

There are a number of fascinating essays in Studies ranging from the history of the Boundary Commission itself to explorations of how the island might evolve in the coming decades. An important theme is the challenge what a move towards a united Ireland would require of voters in the Republic.

That challenge is not just the potentially massive financial cost but the abandonment of cherished cultural symbols such as the Irish flag and anthem and indeed the Constitution itself, not to mention the daunting challenge of integrating the public service and welfare systems in the two parts of the island.

[ Flags and symbols will remain a point of division between North and SouthOpens in new window ]

An equally challenging view from the northern side of the Border was presented at a seminar in the Royal Irish Academy last week by Prof Pete Shirlow, head of the Irish studies department at the University of Liverpool. His talk was part of the ARINS project examining the future of the island.

Shirlow presented a variety of research that showed that support for a united Ireland is not growing in the North, despite the demographic changes that have seen Sinn Féin become the biggest party, with Michelle O’Neill as First Minister. Surveys show that younger people are less attached to nationalism and unionism, with growing numbers content to express a Northern Irish identity. They also show that the North is becoming more inclusive and less sectarian as time goes on.

Rory McIlroy, one of the generation keen to describe himself as Northern Irish rather than Irish or British, achieved his destiny when he won the US Masters last weekend. Being Northern Irish did not stop McIlroy playing for Ireland in the last Olympics, just as Ulster rugby players have always played for Ireland.

[ Philip Reid: I’ve been to all of Rory McIlroy’s Major triumphs. This Masters win is unmatched in historyOpens in new window ]

It is a long time since John Hume remarked that the kind of unity he sought was not unity of territory but unity of people. The Ireland that has gradually emerged since the Belfast Agreement, and continues to evolve, is surely on the road to the kind of unity he was talking about.

People living on this island can move across the Border without hindrance, can live on one side and work on the other, avail of the health services on either side that best meet their needs. The North is also in the unique position of being part of the European single market as well as the UK market.

Of course everything in the garden is not rosy. The political structures established by the Belfast Agreement have had a stop-start existence for the past three decades and the legacy of the Troubles is still an open wound. Still, both parts of the island are thriving, with the combined population set to surpass the pre-Famine peak for the first time in the coming years.

With so many international challenges facing the governments of Ireland and the UK, from Trump’s tariffs to the need to ramp up defence spending in the face of Russian aggression, talk of Irish unity is a diversion from the real challenges facing us.

Those who dream of a united Ireland involving the Tricolour flying over Stormont are as stuck in the past as people in the UK who voted to leave the EU to recreate a vanished Empire. In so many of the ways that matter to people, we have a united Ireland now. Let’s build on that.


SF/ PIRA = Scum
There are a number of fascinating essays in Studies ranging from the history of the Boundary Commission itself to explorations of how the island might evolve in the coming decades. An important theme is the challenge what a move towards a united Ireland would require of voters in the Republic.

That challenge is not just the potentially massive financial cost but the abandonment of cherished cultural symbols such as the Irish flag and anthem and indeed the Constitution itself, not to mention the daunting challenge of integrating the public service and welfare systems in the two parts of the island.
What unadulterated horseshit. Look over there lads ! Flag ! Anthem ! Constitution !

IRA Shinners, Varadkar and now even Martin, are taking us for fools.

1. Glossing over the "potentially" massive financial cost with flag and anthem, when both have already been appropriated by terrorists and racists. €20bn a year to support the nordies for the following couple of decades will drive us into recession - Germany were far wealthier than us and it's cost them over 20 years of a dragging economy, supporting a former East Germany that has gone all Nazi.

2. NI is rotten with sectarianism and loyalism. There are 12,500 loyalist paramilitaries, while the republican fucks are delighted to land their nutjob equivalents onto our lap.

3. Over 90% of NI education is split between nationalist and unionist schools.

4 160 peace walls in NI.

5. If you are being supported by welfare in the Republic or are working class, and we have to pay for those in NI, do you think that cost will be borne by

  1. taxing the rich & middle class
  2. cutting back on current ROI public services expenditure
  3. keeping the current expenditure but making it "do" for the entire island
  4. mostly taxing the working class/cutting public services/reducing social welfare benefits
6. What do you think Cork's position will be within a UI ? And the other cities for that matter ? Any UI agreement will see Belfast demanding and getting massive attention within the UI, and it will be to the detriment of every town and city outside of Dublin.

7. What you will see is NI getting massive infrastructure development investment, investment that we have been starved of. FDI will be poured into NI because of its lower cost base AND at the same corporation tax rate as us. They are our competitor, and we would be handing them our bank account and all the investment.

8. There is zero reason for NI to be an economic mess, but SFIRA have spent the last 27 years blocking economic development, yet we are the ones who would be lumped with the cost of it.

But yeah, Flag and Anthem. Horseshit.
 
What unadulterated horseshit. Look over there lads ! Flag ! Anthem ! Constitution !

IRA Shinners, Varadkar and now even Martin, are taking us for fools.

1. Glossing over the "potentially" massive financial cost with flag and anthem, when both have already been appropriated by terrorists and racists. €20bn a year to support the nordies for the following couple of decades will drive us into recession - Germany were far wealthier than us and it's cost them over 20 years of a dragging economy, supporting a former East Germany that has gone all Nazi.

2. NI is rotten with sectarianism and loyalism. There are 12,500 loyalist paramilitaries, while the republican fucks are delighted to land their nutjob equivalents onto our lap.

3. Over 90% of NI education is split between nationalist and unionist schools.

4 160 peace walls in NI.

5. If you are being supported by welfare in the Republic or are working class, and we have to pay for those in NI, do you think that cost will be borne by

  1. taxing the rich & middle class
  2. cutting back on current ROI public services expenditure
  3. keeping the current expenditure but making it "do" for the entire island
  4. mostly taxing the working class/cutting public services/reducing social welfare benefits
6. What do you think Cork's position will be within a UI ? And the other cities for that matter ? Any UI agreement will see Belfast demanding and getting massive attention within the UI, and it will be to the detriment of every town and city outside of Dublin.

7. What you will see is NI getting massive infrastructure development investment, investment that we have been starved of. FDI will be poured into NI because of its lower cost base AND at the same corporation tax rate as us. They are our competitor, and we would be handing them our bank account and all the investment.

8. There is zero reason for NI to be an economic mess, but SFIRA have spent the last 27 years blocking economic development, yet we are the ones who would be lumped with the cost of it.

But yeah, Flag and Anthem. Horseshit.
Well said, even better than the article I posted.

But the thing is, those with lower IQ and the thick stupid amongst us are the ones that believe the shit that SF/PIRA mouth pieces come out with.

So those fools will vote as the Cult tells them.

SF/PIRA = Scum
 
EVENT GUIDE - HIGHLIGHT
Stand-up Comedy Laboratory - Daytime Show
The Roundy, Castle St.

2nd Jul 2025 @ 1:00 pm
More info..

Something Like That

The Woodford, Today @ 9:30PM

More events ▼
Top