That's what I said.
Fair play to you.
That's what I said.
I was agreeing with you - or are you incapable of telling the difference at this stage?
The fact that SF took appropriate action when it was informed means I dont find any need to dodge anything....but you know that too!
So what appropriate action did Sinn Fein take when Mary was rescued from the house by social workers in 1980 and had to spend 3 months in hospital. This is what Mary said:
"Over 100 local women protested outside our house the night Social Services took me away so why did Sinn Fein give her senior positions within the party years later?"
Evidence that Sinn Féin are sex abuse enablers?
Check.
I thought that is what the thread is about. Would you prefer if I did not criticise Sf ? SF councillor allegedly maltreats child- should nop one comment?
To be honest if you are going to attack SF about child abuse then you will have to examine, FF, FG, Labour all in power in the Republic when children were being systematically raped in state run or sponsored institutions right up to the 80's. It is obvious from the reports that Ministers in all Governments since 50's were aware of the abuse yet they did nothing to ease the plight of the abused, hence why they are keeping their mouths shut on subjects such as these. So who of the political elite carry the greatest guilt?
Look slagging is run of the mill on threads such as SF shower of knuckle heads etc but Westie is just using some poor abused child to claim SF are a crowd of child abusers which is a bit much and a bit extreme to say the least. If he thinks that this is going to turn people off SF it will probably do the opposite because it makes Westie look extreme not them.
I would say to you to read the OP and that explains everything. I know that Westie can get a tad overexcited and hyperenthusiastic, but I take his point on this one.